Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs IBM Granite 3.1 8B

Compare Llama 3.2 90B Vision and IBM Granite 3.1 8B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Meta models All IBM models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Llama 3.2 90B Vision IBM Granite 3.1 8B
CategoryVisionEnterprise
Parameters90B8B
Context Window128K128K
Input Price$0.06/1M tokens$0.01/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokens$0.02/1M tokens
Latency~500ms~80ms

Choose Llama 3.2 90B Vision when:

  • ✓ Chart image analysis
  • ✓ Document scanning
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Vision + language, Open weights, Good reasoning

Choose IBM Granite 3.1 8B when:

  • ✓ Regulated industries
  • ✓ Enterprise compliance
  • ✓ IBM ecosystem
Key Strengths:

Enterprise compliance, IP indemnification, 128K context

Verdict: Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs IBM Granite 3.1 8B

For cost efficiency, IBM Granite 3.1 8B wins at $0.01/1M input tokens. For speed, Llama 3.2 90B Vision is faster at ~500ms. Llama 3.2 90B Vision excels at Chart image analysis while IBM Granite 3.1 8B is better for Regulated industries. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Llama 3.2 90B Vision costs $0.06/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. IBM Granite 3.1 8B costs $0.01 input and $0.02 output. IBM Granite 3.1 8B is 6.0x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Llama 3.2 90B Vision has a 128K context window with ~500ms latency. IBM Granite 3.1 8B offers 128K context at ~80ms. Both have identical context windows.

Best For

Llama 3.2 90B Vision (Vision) is optimized for: Chart image analysis, Document scanning, Visual Q&A. IBM Granite 3.1 8B (Enterprise) works best for: Regulated industries, Enterprise compliance, IBM ecosystem.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Llama 3.2 90B Vision
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="llama-3-2-90b-vision",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use IBM Granite 3.1 8B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="granite-3-1-8b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Llama 3.2 90B Vision or IBM Granite 3.1 8B?

Llama 3.2 90B Vision (Vision, 90B) offers Vision + language. IBM Granite 3.1 8B (Enterprise, 8B) offers Enterprise compliance. Choose Llama 3.2 90B Vision for Chart image analysis or IBM Granite 3.1 8B for Regulated industries.

How much does Llama 3.2 90B Vision cost vs IBM Granite 3.1 8B?

Llama 3.2 90B Vision: $0.06/1M input, $0.10/1M output. IBM Granite 3.1 8B: $0.01/1M input, $0.02/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Llama 3.2 90B Vision and IBM Granite 3.1 8B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Vedika Vision Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Pixtral Large Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Pixtral 12B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.