Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Deepgram Nova 3

Compare Llama 3.2 90B Vision and Deepgram Nova 3: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Meta models All Deepgram models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Llama 3.2 90B Vision Deepgram Nova 3
CategoryVisionSpeech
Parameters90B~1B
Context Window128KStreaming
Input Price$0.06/1M tokens$0.004/min/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokensN/A/1M tokens
Latency~500ms~100ms

Choose Llama 3.2 90B Vision when:

  • ✓ Chart image analysis
  • ✓ Document scanning
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Vision + language, Open weights, Good reasoning

Choose Deepgram Nova 3 when:

  • ✓ Real-time transcription
  • ✓ Call centers
  • ✓ Meeting notes
Key Strengths:

Ultra-low latency, Streaming native, Very cheap

Verdict: Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Deepgram Nova 3

For cost efficiency, Deepgram Nova 3 wins at $0.004/min/1M input tokens. For speed, Deepgram Nova 3 is faster at ~100ms. Llama 3.2 90B Vision excels at Chart image analysis while Deepgram Nova 3 is better for Real-time transcription. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Llama 3.2 90B Vision costs $0.06/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. Deepgram Nova 3 costs $0.004/min input and N/A output. Deepgram Nova 3 is 15.0x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Llama 3.2 90B Vision has a 128K context window with ~500ms latency. Deepgram Nova 3 offers Streaming context at ~100ms. Both have identical context windows.

Best For

Llama 3.2 90B Vision (Vision) is optimized for: Chart image analysis, Document scanning, Visual Q&A. Deepgram Nova 3 (Speech) works best for: Real-time transcription, Call centers, Meeting notes.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Llama 3.2 90B Vision
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="llama-3-2-90b-vision",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Deepgram Nova 3
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="deepgram-nova-3",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Llama 3.2 90B Vision or Deepgram Nova 3?

Llama 3.2 90B Vision (Vision, 90B) offers Vision + language. Deepgram Nova 3 (Speech, ~1B) offers Ultra-low latency. Choose Llama 3.2 90B Vision for Chart image analysis or Deepgram Nova 3 for Real-time transcription.

How much does Llama 3.2 90B Vision cost vs Deepgram Nova 3?

Llama 3.2 90B Vision: $0.06/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Deepgram Nova 3: $0.004/min/1M input, N/A/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Llama 3.2 90B Vision and Deepgram Nova 3 by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Vedika Vision Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Whisper Large V3 Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Pixtral Large

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.