Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs DBRX

Compare Llama 3.2 90B Vision and DBRX: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Meta models All Databricks models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Llama 3.2 90B Vision DBRX
CategoryVisionEnterprise
Parameters90B132B (36B active)
Context Window128K32K
Input Price$0.06/1M tokens$0.04/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokens$0.08/1M tokens
Latency~500ms~300ms

Choose Llama 3.2 90B Vision when:

  • ✓ Chart image analysis
  • ✓ Document scanning
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Vision + language, Open weights, Good reasoning

Choose DBRX when:

  • ✓ Data pipelines
  • ✓ Analytics
  • ✓ Enterprise workflows
Key Strengths:

MoE efficient, Good for data, Enterprise-grade

Verdict: Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs DBRX

For cost efficiency, DBRX wins at $0.04/1M input tokens. For speed, DBRX is faster at ~300ms. Llama 3.2 90B Vision excels at Chart image analysis while DBRX is better for Data pipelines. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Llama 3.2 90B Vision costs $0.06/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. DBRX costs $0.04 input and $0.08 output. DBRX is 1.5x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Llama 3.2 90B Vision has a 128K context window with ~500ms latency. DBRX offers 32K context at ~300ms. Llama 3.2 90B Vision has the larger context window.

Best For

Llama 3.2 90B Vision (Vision) is optimized for: Chart image analysis, Document scanning, Visual Q&A. DBRX (Enterprise) works best for: Data pipelines, Analytics, Enterprise workflows.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Llama 3.2 90B Vision
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="llama-3-2-90b-vision",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use DBRX
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="dbrx",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Llama 3.2 90B Vision or DBRX?

Llama 3.2 90B Vision (Vision, 90B) offers Vision + language. DBRX (Enterprise, 132B (36B active)) offers MoE efficient. Choose Llama 3.2 90B Vision for Chart image analysis or DBRX for Data pipelines.

How much does Llama 3.2 90B Vision cost vs DBRX?

Llama 3.2 90B Vision: $0.06/1M input, $0.10/1M output. DBRX: $0.04/1M input, $0.08/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Llama 3.2 90B Vision and DBRX by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Vedika Vision Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Pixtral Large Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Pixtral 12B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.