Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Code Llama 70B

Compare Llama 3.2 90B Vision and Code Llama 70B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Meta models All Meta models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Llama 3.2 90B Vision Code Llama 70B
CategoryVisionCode
Parameters90B70B
Context Window128K100K
Input Price$0.06/1M tokens$0.04/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokens$0.06/1M tokens
Latency~500ms~300ms

Choose Llama 3.2 90B Vision when:

  • ✓ Chart image analysis
  • ✓ Document scanning
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Vision + language, Open weights, Good reasoning

Choose Code Llama 70B when:

  • ✓ Large codebases
  • ✓ Code review
  • ✓ Refactoring
Key Strengths:

100K context, Strong coding, Fill-in-middle

Verdict: Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Code Llama 70B

For cost efficiency, Code Llama 70B wins at $0.04/1M input tokens. For speed, Code Llama 70B is faster at ~300ms. Llama 3.2 90B Vision excels at Chart image analysis while Code Llama 70B is better for Large codebases. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Llama 3.2 90B Vision costs $0.06/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. Code Llama 70B costs $0.04 input and $0.06 output. Code Llama 70B is 1.5x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Llama 3.2 90B Vision has a 128K context window with ~500ms latency. Code Llama 70B offers 100K context at ~300ms. Llama 3.2 90B Vision has the larger context window.

Best For

Llama 3.2 90B Vision (Vision) is optimized for: Chart image analysis, Document scanning, Visual Q&A. Code Llama 70B (Code) works best for: Large codebases, Code review, Refactoring.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Llama 3.2 90B Vision
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="llama-3-2-90b-vision",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Code Llama 70B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="codellama-70b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Llama 3.2 90B Vision or Code Llama 70B?

Llama 3.2 90B Vision (Vision, 90B) offers Vision + language. Code Llama 70B (Code, 70B) offers 100K context. Choose Llama 3.2 90B Vision for Chart image analysis or Code Llama 70B for Large codebases.

How much does Llama 3.2 90B Vision cost vs Code Llama 70B?

Llama 3.2 90B Vision: $0.06/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Code Llama 70B: $0.04/1M input, $0.06/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Llama 3.2 90B Vision and Code Llama 70B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Vedika Vision Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Vedika Code Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs DeepSeek Coder V2 Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Qwen 2.5 VL 72B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.