Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Aya Expanse 32B

Compare Llama 3.2 90B Vision and Aya Expanse 32B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Meta models All Cohere models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Llama 3.2 90B Vision Aya Expanse 32B
CategoryVisionOpen Source
Parameters90B32B
Context Window128K128K
Input Price$0.06/1M tokens$0.03/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokens$0.06/1M tokens
Latency~500ms~250ms

Choose Llama 3.2 90B Vision when:

  • ✓ Chart image analysis
  • ✓ Document scanning
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Vision + language, Open weights, Good reasoning

Choose Aya Expanse 32B when:

  • ✓ Multilingual apps
  • ✓ Translation
  • ✓ Global content
Key Strengths:

23 languages, Open weights, Strong multilingual

Verdict: Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Aya Expanse 32B

For cost efficiency, Aya Expanse 32B wins at $0.03/1M input tokens. For speed, Aya Expanse 32B is faster at ~250ms. Llama 3.2 90B Vision excels at Chart image analysis while Aya Expanse 32B is better for Multilingual apps. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Llama 3.2 90B Vision costs $0.06/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. Aya Expanse 32B costs $0.03 input and $0.06 output. Aya Expanse 32B is 2.0x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Llama 3.2 90B Vision has a 128K context window with ~500ms latency. Aya Expanse 32B offers 128K context at ~250ms. Both have identical context windows.

Best For

Llama 3.2 90B Vision (Vision) is optimized for: Chart image analysis, Document scanning, Visual Q&A. Aya Expanse 32B (Open Source) works best for: Multilingual apps, Translation, Global content.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Llama 3.2 90B Vision
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="llama-3-2-90b-vision",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Aya Expanse 32B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="c4ai-aya-expanse-32b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Llama 3.2 90B Vision or Aya Expanse 32B?

Llama 3.2 90B Vision (Vision, 90B) offers Vision + language. Aya Expanse 32B (Open Source, 32B) offers 23 languages. Choose Llama 3.2 90B Vision for Chart image analysis or Aya Expanse 32B for Multilingual apps.

How much does Llama 3.2 90B Vision cost vs Aya Expanse 32B?

Llama 3.2 90B Vision: $0.06/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Aya Expanse 32B: $0.03/1M input, $0.06/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Llama 3.2 90B Vision and Aya Expanse 32B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Vedika Vision Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Gemma 3 27B Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Llama 4 Scout Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Llama 4 Maverick Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Llama 3.3 70B Llama 3.2 90B Vision vs Llama 3.1 405B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.