Llama 3.2 11B Vision vs Llama 3.2 3B

Compare Llama 3.2 11B Vision and Llama 3.2 3B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Meta models All Meta models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Llama 3.2 11B Vision Llama 3.2 3B
CategoryVisionCompact
Parameters11B3B
Context Window128K128K
Input Price$0.02/1M tokens$0.006/1M tokens
Output Price$0.04/1M tokens$0.012/1M tokens
Latency~200ms~40ms

Choose Llama 3.2 11B Vision when:

  • ✓ Image classification
  • ✓ OCR
  • ✓ Simple visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Low cost vision, Fast, Compact

Choose Llama 3.2 3B when:

  • ✓ Mobile apps
  • ✓ Edge inference
  • ✓ Preprocessing
Key Strengths:

Ultra-small, Edge-ready, Minimal latency

Verdict: Llama 3.2 11B Vision vs Llama 3.2 3B

For cost efficiency, Llama 3.2 3B wins at $0.006/1M input tokens. For speed, Llama 3.2 11B Vision is faster at ~200ms. Llama 3.2 11B Vision excels at Image classification while Llama 3.2 3B is better for Mobile apps. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Llama 3.2 11B Vision costs $0.02/1M input tokens and $0.04/1M output tokens. Llama 3.2 3B costs $0.006 input and $0.012 output. Llama 3.2 3B is 3.3x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Llama 3.2 11B Vision has a 128K context window with ~200ms latency. Llama 3.2 3B offers 128K context at ~40ms. Both have identical context windows.

Best For

Llama 3.2 11B Vision (Vision) is optimized for: Image classification, OCR, Simple visual Q&A. Llama 3.2 3B (Compact) works best for: Mobile apps, Edge inference, Preprocessing.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Llama 3.2 11B Vision
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="llama-3-2-11b-vision",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Llama 3.2 3B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="llama-3-2-3b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Llama 3.2 11B Vision or Llama 3.2 3B?

Llama 3.2 11B Vision (Vision, 11B) offers Low cost vision. Llama 3.2 3B (Compact, 3B) offers Ultra-small. Choose Llama 3.2 11B Vision for Image classification or Llama 3.2 3B for Mobile apps.

How much does Llama 3.2 11B Vision cost vs Llama 3.2 3B?

Llama 3.2 11B Vision: $0.02/1M input, $0.04/1M output. Llama 3.2 3B: $0.006/1M input, $0.012/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Llama 3.2 11B Vision and Llama 3.2 3B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Llama 3.2 11B Vision vs Vedika Vision Llama 3.2 11B Vision vs GPT-4.1 Nano Llama 3.2 11B Vision vs GPT-4o Mini Llama 3.2 11B Vision vs Claude Haiku 3.5 Llama 3.2 11B Vision vs Gemma 3 12B Llama 3.2 11B Vision vs Gemma 3 4B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.