Llama 3.1 8B Turbo vs Stable Image Ultra

Compare Llama 3.1 8B Turbo and Stable Image Ultra: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Meta models All Stability AI models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Llama 3.1 8B Turbo Stable Image Ultra
CategoryCompactImage
Parameters8B~12B
Context Window128KN/A
Input Price$0.01/1M tokens$0.008/image/1M tokens
Output Price$0.02/1M tokensN/A/1M tokens
Latency~60ms~4s

Choose Llama 3.1 8B Turbo when:

  • ✓ Intent classification
  • ✓ Content filtering
  • ✓ Simple Q&A
Key Strengths:

Extremely fast, Very low cost, 128K context

Choose Stable Image Ultra when:

  • ✓ Premium photography
  • ✓ Marketing
  • ✓ Product shoots
Key Strengths:

Highest quality, Photorealistic, Professional

Verdict: Llama 3.1 8B Turbo vs Stable Image Ultra

For cost efficiency, Stable Image Ultra wins at $0.008/image/1M input tokens. For speed, Stable Image Ultra is faster at ~4s. Llama 3.1 8B Turbo excels at Intent classification while Stable Image Ultra is better for Premium photography. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Llama 3.1 8B Turbo costs $0.01/1M input tokens and $0.02/1M output tokens. Stable Image Ultra costs $0.008/image input and N/A output. Stable Image Ultra is 1.3x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Llama 3.1 8B Turbo has a 128K context window with ~60ms latency. Stable Image Ultra offers N/A context at ~4s. Llama 3.1 8B Turbo has the larger context window.

Best For

Llama 3.1 8B Turbo (Compact) is optimized for: Intent classification, Content filtering, Simple Q&A. Stable Image Ultra (Image) works best for: Premium photography, Marketing, Product shoots.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Llama 3.1 8B Turbo
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="llama-3-1-8b-turbo",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Stable Image Ultra
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="stable-image-ultra",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Llama 3.1 8B Turbo or Stable Image Ultra?

Llama 3.1 8B Turbo (Compact, 8B) offers Extremely fast. Stable Image Ultra (Image, ~12B) offers Highest quality. Choose Llama 3.1 8B Turbo for Intent classification or Stable Image Ultra for Premium photography.

How much does Llama 3.1 8B Turbo cost vs Stable Image Ultra?

Llama 3.1 8B Turbo: $0.01/1M input, $0.02/1M output. Stable Image Ultra: $0.008/image/1M input, N/A/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Llama 3.1 8B Turbo and Stable Image Ultra by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Llama 3.1 8B Turbo vs GPT-4.1 Nano Llama 3.1 8B Turbo vs GPT-4o Mini Llama 3.1 8B Turbo vs DALL-E 3 Llama 3.1 8B Turbo vs Claude Haiku 3.5 Llama 3.1 8B Turbo vs Gemma 3 12B Llama 3.1 8B Turbo vs Gemma 3 4B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.