Llama 3.1 70B Turbo vs WizardLM 2 8x22B

Compare Llama 3.1 70B Turbo and WizardLM 2 8x22B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Meta models All Microsoft models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Llama 3.1 70B Turbo WizardLM 2 8x22B
CategoryOpen SourceOpen Source
Parameters70B176B (22B active)
Context Window128K65K
Input Price$0.04/1M tokens$0.04/1M tokens
Output Price$0.06/1M tokens$0.08/1M tokens
Latency~250ms~350ms

Choose Llama 3.1 70B Turbo when:

  • ✓ Production APIs
  • ✓ Fast generation
  • ✓ General purpose
Key Strengths:

Fast inference, Good quality, Well-tested

Choose WizardLM 2 8x22B when:

  • ✓ Complex instructions
  • ✓ Math tasks
  • ✓ Structured output
Key Strengths:

Strong instruction following, Good math, MoE efficient

Verdict: Llama 3.1 70B Turbo vs WizardLM 2 8x22B

For cost efficiency, WizardLM 2 8x22B wins at $0.04/1M input tokens. For speed, Llama 3.1 70B Turbo is faster at ~250ms. Llama 3.1 70B Turbo excels at Production APIs while WizardLM 2 8x22B is better for Complex instructions. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Llama 3.1 70B Turbo costs $0.04/1M input tokens and $0.06/1M output tokens. WizardLM 2 8x22B costs $0.04 input and $0.08 output. Both models are similarly priced. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Llama 3.1 70B Turbo has a 128K context window with ~250ms latency. WizardLM 2 8x22B offers 65K context at ~350ms. Llama 3.1 70B Turbo has the larger context window.

Best For

Llama 3.1 70B Turbo (Open Source) is optimized for: Production APIs, Fast generation, General purpose. WizardLM 2 8x22B (Open Source) works best for: Complex instructions, Math tasks, Structured output.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Llama 3.1 70B Turbo
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="llama-3-1-70b-turbo",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use WizardLM 2 8x22B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="wizardlm-2-8x22b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Llama 3.1 70B Turbo or WizardLM 2 8x22B?

Llama 3.1 70B Turbo (Open Source, 70B) offers Fast inference. WizardLM 2 8x22B (Open Source, 176B (22B active)) offers Strong instruction following. Choose Llama 3.1 70B Turbo for Production APIs or WizardLM 2 8x22B for Complex instructions.

How much does Llama 3.1 70B Turbo cost vs WizardLM 2 8x22B?

Llama 3.1 70B Turbo: $0.04/1M input, $0.06/1M output. WizardLM 2 8x22B: $0.04/1M input, $0.08/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Llama 3.1 70B Turbo and WizardLM 2 8x22B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Llama 3.1 70B Turbo vs Gemma 3 27B Llama 3.1 70B Turbo vs Llama 4 Scout Llama 3.1 70B Turbo vs Llama 4 Maverick Llama 3.1 70B Turbo vs Llama 3.3 70B Llama 3.1 70B Turbo vs Llama 3.1 405B Llama 3.1 70B Turbo vs DeepSeek V3

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.