Llama 3.1 70B Turbo vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision

Compare Llama 3.1 70B Turbo and Llama 3.2 90B Vision: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Meta models All Meta models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Llama 3.1 70B Turbo Llama 3.2 90B Vision
CategoryOpen SourceVision
Parameters70B90B
Context Window128K128K
Input Price$0.04/1M tokens$0.06/1M tokens
Output Price$0.06/1M tokens$0.10/1M tokens
Latency~250ms~500ms

Choose Llama 3.1 70B Turbo when:

  • ✓ Production APIs
  • ✓ Fast generation
  • ✓ General purpose
Key Strengths:

Fast inference, Good quality, Well-tested

Choose Llama 3.2 90B Vision when:

  • ✓ Chart image analysis
  • ✓ Document scanning
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Vision + language, Open weights, Good reasoning

Verdict: Llama 3.1 70B Turbo vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision

For cost efficiency, Llama 3.1 70B Turbo wins at $0.04/1M input tokens. For speed, Llama 3.1 70B Turbo is faster at ~250ms. Llama 3.1 70B Turbo excels at Production APIs while Llama 3.2 90B Vision is better for Chart image analysis. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Llama 3.1 70B Turbo costs $0.04/1M input tokens and $0.06/1M output tokens. Llama 3.2 90B Vision costs $0.06 input and $0.10 output. Llama 3.1 70B Turbo is 1.5x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Llama 3.1 70B Turbo has a 128K context window with ~250ms latency. Llama 3.2 90B Vision offers 128K context at ~500ms. Both have identical context windows.

Best For

Llama 3.1 70B Turbo (Open Source) is optimized for: Production APIs, Fast generation, General purpose. Llama 3.2 90B Vision (Vision) works best for: Chart image analysis, Document scanning, Visual Q&A.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Llama 3.1 70B Turbo
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="llama-3-1-70b-turbo",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Llama 3.2 90B Vision
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="llama-3-2-90b-vision",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Llama 3.1 70B Turbo or Llama 3.2 90B Vision?

Llama 3.1 70B Turbo (Open Source, 70B) offers Fast inference. Llama 3.2 90B Vision (Vision, 90B) offers Vision + language. Choose Llama 3.1 70B Turbo for Production APIs or Llama 3.2 90B Vision for Chart image analysis.

How much does Llama 3.1 70B Turbo cost vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision?

Llama 3.1 70B Turbo: $0.04/1M input, $0.06/1M output. Llama 3.2 90B Vision: $0.06/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Llama 3.1 70B Turbo and Llama 3.2 90B Vision by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Llama 3.1 70B Turbo vs Vedika Vision Llama 3.1 70B Turbo vs Gemma 3 27B Llama 3.1 70B Turbo vs Llama 4 Scout Llama 3.1 70B Turbo vs Llama 4 Maverick Llama 3.1 70B Turbo vs Llama 3.3 70B Llama 3.1 70B Turbo vs Llama 3.1 405B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.