Jamba 1.5 Large vs InternVL 2.5 78B

Compare Jamba 1.5 Large and InternVL 2.5 78B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All AI21 models All Shanghai AI Lab models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Jamba 1.5 Large InternVL 2.5 78B
CategoryEnterpriseVision
Parameters398B (94B active)78B
Context Window256K128K
Input Price$0.08/1M tokens$0.05/1M tokens
Output Price$0.14/1M tokens$0.10/1M tokens
Latency~500ms~400ms

Choose Jamba 1.5 Large when:

  • ✓ Full text processing
  • ✓ Comprehensive reports
  • ✓ Long analysis
Key Strengths:

256K context, SSM-Transformer hybrid, Good summarization

Choose InternVL 2.5 78B when:

  • ✓ Document analysis
  • ✓ Chart reading
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Strong visual reasoning, Open weights, Good OCR

Verdict: Jamba 1.5 Large vs InternVL 2.5 78B

For cost efficiency, InternVL 2.5 78B wins at $0.05/1M input tokens. For speed, InternVL 2.5 78B is faster at ~400ms. Jamba 1.5 Large excels at Full text processing while InternVL 2.5 78B is better for Document analysis. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Jamba 1.5 Large costs $0.08/1M input tokens and $0.14/1M output tokens. InternVL 2.5 78B costs $0.05 input and $0.10 output. InternVL 2.5 78B is 1.6x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Jamba 1.5 Large has a 256K context window with ~500ms latency. InternVL 2.5 78B offers 128K context at ~400ms. Jamba 1.5 Large has the larger context window.

Best For

Jamba 1.5 Large (Enterprise) is optimized for: Full text processing, Comprehensive reports, Long analysis. InternVL 2.5 78B (Vision) works best for: Document analysis, Chart reading, Visual Q&A.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Jamba 1.5 Large
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="jamba-1-5-large",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use InternVL 2.5 78B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="internvl-2-5-78b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Jamba 1.5 Large or InternVL 2.5 78B?

Jamba 1.5 Large (Enterprise, 398B (94B active)) offers 256K context. InternVL 2.5 78B (Vision, 78B) offers Strong visual reasoning. Choose Jamba 1.5 Large for Full text processing or InternVL 2.5 78B for Document analysis.

How much does Jamba 1.5 Large cost vs InternVL 2.5 78B?

Jamba 1.5 Large: $0.08/1M input, $0.14/1M output. InternVL 2.5 78B: $0.05/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Jamba 1.5 Large and InternVL 2.5 78B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Jamba 1.5 Large vs Vedika Vision Jamba 1.5 Large vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision Jamba 1.5 Large vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision Jamba 1.5 Large vs Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Jamba 1.5 Large vs Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Jamba 1.5 Large vs Pixtral Large

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.