InternVL 2.5 78B vs Udio v2

Compare InternVL 2.5 78B and Udio v2: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Shanghai AI Lab models All Udio models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature InternVL 2.5 78B Udio v2
CategoryVisionAudio
Parameters78B~5B
Context Window128KN/A
Input Price$0.05/1M tokens$0.04/song/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokensN/A/1M tokens
Latency~400ms~25s

Choose InternVL 2.5 78B when:

  • ✓ Document analysis
  • ✓ Chart reading
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Strong visual reasoning, Open weights, Good OCR

Choose Udio v2 when:

  • ✓ Music creation
  • ✓ Jingles
  • ✓ Devotional music
Key Strengths:

High-quality vocals, Genre variety, Lyric integration

Verdict: InternVL 2.5 78B vs Udio v2

For cost efficiency, Udio v2 wins at $0.04/song/1M input tokens. For speed, Udio v2 is faster at ~25s. InternVL 2.5 78B excels at Document analysis while Udio v2 is better for Music creation. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

InternVL 2.5 78B costs $0.05/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. Udio v2 costs $0.04/song input and N/A output. Udio v2 is 1.3x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

InternVL 2.5 78B has a 128K context window with ~400ms latency. Udio v2 offers N/A context at ~25s. InternVL 2.5 78B has the larger context window.

Best For

InternVL 2.5 78B (Vision) is optimized for: Document analysis, Chart reading, Visual Q&A. Udio v2 (Audio) works best for: Music creation, Jingles, Devotional music.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use InternVL 2.5 78B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="internvl-2-5-78b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Udio v2
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="udio-v2",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, InternVL 2.5 78B or Udio v2?

InternVL 2.5 78B (Vision, 78B) offers Strong visual reasoning. Udio v2 (Audio, ~5B) offers High-quality vocals. Choose InternVL 2.5 78B for Document analysis or Udio v2 for Music creation.

How much does InternVL 2.5 78B cost vs Udio v2?

InternVL 2.5 78B: $0.05/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Udio v2: $0.04/song/1M input, N/A/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between InternVL 2.5 78B and Udio v2 by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

InternVL 2.5 78B vs Vedika Vision InternVL 2.5 78B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision InternVL 2.5 78B vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision InternVL 2.5 78B vs Qwen 2.5 VL 72B InternVL 2.5 78B vs Qwen 2.5 VL 7B InternVL 2.5 78B vs Pixtral Large

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.