InternVL 2.5 78B vs Meshy v4

Compare InternVL 2.5 78B and Meshy v4: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Shanghai AI Lab models All Meshy models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature InternVL 2.5 78B Meshy v4
CategoryVision3D
Parameters78B~3B
Context Window128KN/A
Input Price$0.05/1M tokens$0.10/model/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokensN/A/1M tokens
Latency~400ms~60s

Choose InternVL 2.5 78B when:

  • ✓ Document analysis
  • ✓ Chart reading
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Strong visual reasoning, Open weights, Good OCR

Choose Meshy v4 when:

  • ✓ 3D asset creation
  • ✓ Game assets
  • ✓ Product visualization
Key Strengths:

3D model output, PBR textures, Multiple formats

Verdict: InternVL 2.5 78B vs Meshy v4

For cost efficiency, InternVL 2.5 78B wins at $0.05/1M input tokens. For speed, InternVL 2.5 78B is faster at ~400ms. InternVL 2.5 78B excels at Document analysis while Meshy v4 is better for 3D asset creation. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

InternVL 2.5 78B costs $0.05/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. Meshy v4 costs $0.10/model input and N/A output. InternVL 2.5 78B is 2.0x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

InternVL 2.5 78B has a 128K context window with ~400ms latency. Meshy v4 offers N/A context at ~60s. InternVL 2.5 78B has the larger context window.

Best For

InternVL 2.5 78B (Vision) is optimized for: Document analysis, Chart reading, Visual Q&A. Meshy v4 (3D) works best for: 3D asset creation, Game assets, Product visualization.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use InternVL 2.5 78B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="internvl-2-5-78b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Meshy v4
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="meshy-4",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, InternVL 2.5 78B or Meshy v4?

InternVL 2.5 78B (Vision, 78B) offers Strong visual reasoning. Meshy v4 (3D, ~3B) offers 3D model output. Choose InternVL 2.5 78B for Document analysis or Meshy v4 for 3D asset creation.

How much does InternVL 2.5 78B cost vs Meshy v4?

InternVL 2.5 78B: $0.05/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Meshy v4: $0.10/model/1M input, N/A/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between InternVL 2.5 78B and Meshy v4 by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

InternVL 2.5 78B vs Vedika Vision InternVL 2.5 78B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision InternVL 2.5 78B vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision InternVL 2.5 78B vs Qwen 2.5 VL 72B InternVL 2.5 78B vs Qwen 2.5 VL 7B InternVL 2.5 78B vs Pixtral Large

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.