InternVL 2.5 78B vs CodeGemma 7B

Compare InternVL 2.5 78B and CodeGemma 7B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Shanghai AI Lab models All Google models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature InternVL 2.5 78B CodeGemma 7B
CategoryVisionCode
Parameters78B7B
Context Window128K8K
Input Price$0.05/1M tokens$0.008/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokens$0.015/1M tokens
Latency~400ms~60ms

Choose InternVL 2.5 78B when:

  • ✓ Document analysis
  • ✓ Chart reading
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Strong visual reasoning, Open weights, Good OCR

Choose CodeGemma 7B when:

  • ✓ Code completion
  • ✓ Simple generation
  • ✓ Editor plugins
Key Strengths:

Compact, Fast code completion, Open weights

Verdict: InternVL 2.5 78B vs CodeGemma 7B

For cost efficiency, CodeGemma 7B wins at $0.008/1M input tokens. For speed, InternVL 2.5 78B is faster at ~400ms. InternVL 2.5 78B excels at Document analysis while CodeGemma 7B is better for Code completion. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

InternVL 2.5 78B costs $0.05/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. CodeGemma 7B costs $0.008 input and $0.015 output. CodeGemma 7B is 6.3x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

InternVL 2.5 78B has a 128K context window with ~400ms latency. CodeGemma 7B offers 8K context at ~60ms. InternVL 2.5 78B has the larger context window.

Best For

InternVL 2.5 78B (Vision) is optimized for: Document analysis, Chart reading, Visual Q&A. CodeGemma 7B (Code) works best for: Code completion, Simple generation, Editor plugins.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use InternVL 2.5 78B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="internvl-2-5-78b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use CodeGemma 7B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="codegemma-7b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, InternVL 2.5 78B or CodeGemma 7B?

InternVL 2.5 78B (Vision, 78B) offers Strong visual reasoning. CodeGemma 7B (Code, 7B) offers Compact. Choose InternVL 2.5 78B for Document analysis or CodeGemma 7B for Code completion.

How much does InternVL 2.5 78B cost vs CodeGemma 7B?

InternVL 2.5 78B: $0.05/1M input, $0.10/1M output. CodeGemma 7B: $0.008/1M input, $0.015/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between InternVL 2.5 78B and CodeGemma 7B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

InternVL 2.5 78B vs Vedika Vision InternVL 2.5 78B vs Vedika Code InternVL 2.5 78B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision InternVL 2.5 78B vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision InternVL 2.5 78B vs DeepSeek Coder V2 InternVL 2.5 78B vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.