Imagen 3 vs Aya Expanse 32B

Compare Imagen 3 and Aya Expanse 32B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Google models All Cohere models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Imagen 3 Aya Expanse 32B
CategoryImageOpen Source
Parameters~5B32B
Context WindowN/A128K
Input Price$0.04/image/1M tokens$0.03/1M tokens
Output PriceN/A/1M tokens$0.06/1M tokens
Latency~4s~250ms

Choose Imagen 3 when:

  • ✓ Product photography
  • ✓ Marketing visuals
  • ✓ Social media
Key Strengths:

Photorealistic quality, Good text rendering, Safe outputs

Choose Aya Expanse 32B when:

  • ✓ Multilingual apps
  • ✓ Translation
  • ✓ Global content
Key Strengths:

23 languages, Open weights, Strong multilingual

Verdict: Imagen 3 vs Aya Expanse 32B

For cost efficiency, Aya Expanse 32B wins at $0.03/1M input tokens. For speed, Aya Expanse 32B is faster at ~250ms. Imagen 3 excels at Product photography while Aya Expanse 32B is better for Multilingual apps. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Imagen 3 costs $0.04/image/1M input tokens and N/A/1M output tokens. Aya Expanse 32B costs $0.03 input and $0.06 output. Aya Expanse 32B is 1.3x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Imagen 3 has a N/A context window with ~4s latency. Aya Expanse 32B offers 128K context at ~250ms. Aya Expanse 32B has the larger context window.

Best For

Imagen 3 (Image) is optimized for: Product photography, Marketing visuals, Social media. Aya Expanse 32B (Open Source) works best for: Multilingual apps, Translation, Global content.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Imagen 3
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="imagen-3",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Aya Expanse 32B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="c4ai-aya-expanse-32b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Imagen 3 or Aya Expanse 32B?

Imagen 3 (Image, ~5B) offers Photorealistic quality. Aya Expanse 32B (Open Source, 32B) offers 23 languages. Choose Imagen 3 for Product photography or Aya Expanse 32B for Multilingual apps.

How much does Imagen 3 cost vs Aya Expanse 32B?

Imagen 3: $0.04/image/1M input, N/A/1M output. Aya Expanse 32B: $0.03/1M input, $0.06/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Imagen 3 and Aya Expanse 32B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Imagen 3 vs DALL-E 3 Imagen 3 vs Gemma 3 27B Imagen 3 vs Llama 4 Scout Imagen 3 vs Llama 4 Maverick Imagen 3 vs Llama 3.3 70B Imagen 3 vs Llama 3.1 405B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.