Grok 3 vs WizardLM 2 8x22B
Compare Grok 3 and WizardLM 2 8x22B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.
Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology
| Feature | Grok 3 | WizardLM 2 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Frontier | Open Source |
| Parameters | ~800B | 176B (22B active) |
| Context Window | 128K | 65K |
| Input Price | $0.10/1M tokens | $0.04/1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.25/1M tokens | $0.08/1M tokens |
| Latency | ~500ms | ~350ms |
Choose Grok 3 when:
- ✓ Transit predictions
- ✓ Creative interpretations
- ✓ Research
Strong reasoning, Real-time knowledge, Creative output
Choose WizardLM 2 8x22B when:
- ✓ Complex instructions
- ✓ Math tasks
- ✓ Structured output
Strong instruction following, Good math, MoE efficient
Verdict: Grok 3 vs WizardLM 2 8x22B
For cost efficiency, WizardLM 2 8x22B wins at $0.04/1M input tokens. For speed, WizardLM 2 8x22B is faster at ~350ms. Grok 3 excels at Transit predictions while WizardLM 2 8x22B is better for Complex instructions. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.
Detailed Analysis
Pricing Comparison
Grok 3 costs $0.10/1M input tokens and $0.25/1M output tokens. WizardLM 2 8x22B costs $0.04 input and $0.08 output. WizardLM 2 8x22B is 2.5x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.
Performance & Context
Grok 3 has a 128K context window with ~500ms latency. WizardLM 2 8x22B offers 65K context at ~350ms. Grok 3 has the larger context window.
Best For
Grok 3 (Frontier) is optimized for: Transit predictions, Creative interpretations, Research. WizardLM 2 8x22B (Open Source) works best for: Complex instructions, Math tasks, Structured output.
Try Both on XALEN
Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:
from xalen import XALEN
client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")
# Use Grok 3
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
model="grok-3",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)
# Use WizardLM 2 8x22B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
model="wizardlm-2-8x22b",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Grok 3 or WizardLM 2 8x22B?
Grok 3 (Frontier, ~800B) offers Strong reasoning. WizardLM 2 8x22B (Open Source, 176B (22B active)) offers Strong instruction following. Choose Grok 3 for Transit predictions or WizardLM 2 8x22B for Complex instructions.
How much does Grok 3 cost vs WizardLM 2 8x22B?
Grok 3: $0.10/1M input, $0.25/1M output. WizardLM 2 8x22B: $0.04/1M input, $0.08/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.
Can I use both models on XALEN?
Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Grok 3 and WizardLM 2 8x22B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.
Related Comparisons
Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.