IBM Granite 3.1 8B vs Code Llama 70B

Compare IBM Granite 3.1 8B and Code Llama 70B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All IBM models All Meta models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature IBM Granite 3.1 8B Code Llama 70B
CategoryEnterpriseCode
Parameters8B70B
Context Window128K100K
Input Price$0.01/1M tokens$0.04/1M tokens
Output Price$0.02/1M tokens$0.06/1M tokens
Latency~80ms~300ms

Choose IBM Granite 3.1 8B when:

  • ✓ Regulated industries
  • ✓ Enterprise compliance
  • ✓ IBM ecosystem
Key Strengths:

Enterprise compliance, IP indemnification, 128K context

Choose Code Llama 70B when:

  • ✓ Large codebases
  • ✓ Code review
  • ✓ Refactoring
Key Strengths:

100K context, Strong coding, Fill-in-middle

Verdict: IBM Granite 3.1 8B vs Code Llama 70B

For cost efficiency, IBM Granite 3.1 8B wins at $0.01/1M input tokens. For speed, Code Llama 70B is faster at ~300ms. IBM Granite 3.1 8B excels at Regulated industries while Code Llama 70B is better for Large codebases. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

IBM Granite 3.1 8B costs $0.01/1M input tokens and $0.02/1M output tokens. Code Llama 70B costs $0.04 input and $0.06 output. IBM Granite 3.1 8B is 4.0x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

IBM Granite 3.1 8B has a 128K context window with ~80ms latency. Code Llama 70B offers 100K context at ~300ms. IBM Granite 3.1 8B has the larger context window.

Best For

IBM Granite 3.1 8B (Enterprise) is optimized for: Regulated industries, Enterprise compliance, IBM ecosystem. Code Llama 70B (Code) works best for: Large codebases, Code review, Refactoring.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use IBM Granite 3.1 8B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="granite-3-1-8b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Code Llama 70B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="codellama-70b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, IBM Granite 3.1 8B or Code Llama 70B?

IBM Granite 3.1 8B (Enterprise, 8B) offers Enterprise compliance. Code Llama 70B (Code, 70B) offers 100K context. Choose IBM Granite 3.1 8B for Regulated industries or Code Llama 70B for Large codebases.

How much does IBM Granite 3.1 8B cost vs Code Llama 70B?

IBM Granite 3.1 8B: $0.01/1M input, $0.02/1M output. Code Llama 70B: $0.04/1M input, $0.06/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between IBM Granite 3.1 8B and Code Llama 70B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

IBM Granite 3.1 8B vs Vedika Code IBM Granite 3.1 8B vs DeepSeek Coder V2 IBM Granite 3.1 8B vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B IBM Granite 3.1 8B vs Codestral IBM Granite 3.1 8B vs Command R+ IBM Granite 3.1 8B vs Jamba 1.5 Large

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.