GPT-4o Mini vs Llama 4 Scout

Compare GPT-4o Mini and Llama 4 Scout: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All OpenAI models All Meta models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature GPT-4o Mini Llama 4 Scout
CategoryCompactOpen Source
Parameters~70B109B (17B active)
Context Window128K512K
Input Price$0.015/1M tokens$0.05/1M tokens
Output Price$0.06/1M tokens$0.08/1M tokens
Latency~200ms~350ms

Choose GPT-4o Mini when:

  • ✓ High-volume multimodal
  • ✓ Content filtering
  • ✓ Budget apps
Key Strengths:

Low cost multimodal, Vision capable, Fast

Choose Llama 4 Scout when:

  • ✓ Classical text analysis
  • ✓ Long content
  • ✓ Multi-turn
Key Strengths:

512K context, MoE efficiency, Strong multilingual

Verdict: GPT-4o Mini vs Llama 4 Scout

For cost efficiency, GPT-4o Mini wins at $0.015/1M input tokens. For speed, GPT-4o Mini is faster at ~200ms. GPT-4o Mini excels at High-volume multimodal while Llama 4 Scout is better for Classical text analysis. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

GPT-4o Mini costs $0.015/1M input tokens and $0.06/1M output tokens. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.05 input and $0.08 output. GPT-4o Mini is 3.3x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

GPT-4o Mini has a 128K context window with ~200ms latency. Llama 4 Scout offers 512K context at ~350ms. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window.

Best For

GPT-4o Mini (Compact) is optimized for: High-volume multimodal, Content filtering, Budget apps. Llama 4 Scout (Open Source) works best for: Classical text analysis, Long content, Multi-turn.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use GPT-4o Mini
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="gpt-4o-mini",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Llama 4 Scout
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="llama-4-scout",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, GPT-4o Mini or Llama 4 Scout?

GPT-4o Mini (Compact, ~70B) offers Low cost multimodal. Llama 4 Scout (Open Source, 109B (17B active)) offers 512K context. Choose GPT-4o Mini for High-volume multimodal or Llama 4 Scout for Classical text analysis.

How much does GPT-4o Mini cost vs Llama 4 Scout?

GPT-4o Mini: $0.015/1M input, $0.06/1M output. Llama 4 Scout: $0.05/1M input, $0.08/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between GPT-4o Mini and Llama 4 Scout by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

GPT-4o Mini vs GPT-4.1 Nano GPT-4o Mini vs Claude Haiku 3.5 GPT-4o Mini vs Gemma 3 27B GPT-4o Mini vs Gemma 3 12B GPT-4o Mini vs Gemma 3 4B GPT-4o Mini vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.