GPT-4.1 Nano vs InternVL 2.5 78B

Compare GPT-4.1 Nano and InternVL 2.5 78B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All OpenAI models All Shanghai AI Lab models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature GPT-4.1 Nano InternVL 2.5 78B
CategoryCompactVision
Parameters~8B78B
Context Window128K128K
Input Price$0.008/1M tokens$0.05/1M tokens
Output Price$0.02/1M tokens$0.10/1M tokens
Latency~80ms~400ms

Choose GPT-4.1 Nano when:

  • ✓ Real-time chatbots
  • ✓ Classification
  • ✓ Intent detection
Key Strengths:

Ultra-low latency, Extremely low cost, 128K context

Choose InternVL 2.5 78B when:

  • ✓ Document analysis
  • ✓ Chart reading
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Strong visual reasoning, Open weights, Good OCR

Verdict: GPT-4.1 Nano vs InternVL 2.5 78B

For cost efficiency, GPT-4.1 Nano wins at $0.008/1M input tokens. For speed, InternVL 2.5 78B is faster at ~400ms. GPT-4.1 Nano excels at Real-time chatbots while InternVL 2.5 78B is better for Document analysis. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

GPT-4.1 Nano costs $0.008/1M input tokens and $0.02/1M output tokens. InternVL 2.5 78B costs $0.05 input and $0.10 output. GPT-4.1 Nano is 6.3x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

GPT-4.1 Nano has a 128K context window with ~80ms latency. InternVL 2.5 78B offers 128K context at ~400ms. Both have identical context windows.

Best For

GPT-4.1 Nano (Compact) is optimized for: Real-time chatbots, Classification, Intent detection. InternVL 2.5 78B (Vision) works best for: Document analysis, Chart reading, Visual Q&A.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use GPT-4.1 Nano
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="gpt-4-1-nano",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use InternVL 2.5 78B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="internvl-2-5-78b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, GPT-4.1 Nano or InternVL 2.5 78B?

GPT-4.1 Nano (Compact, ~8B) offers Ultra-low latency. InternVL 2.5 78B (Vision, 78B) offers Strong visual reasoning. Choose GPT-4.1 Nano for Real-time chatbots or InternVL 2.5 78B for Document analysis.

How much does GPT-4.1 Nano cost vs InternVL 2.5 78B?

GPT-4.1 Nano: $0.008/1M input, $0.02/1M output. InternVL 2.5 78B: $0.05/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between GPT-4.1 Nano and InternVL 2.5 78B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

GPT-4.1 Nano vs Vedika Vision GPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-4o Mini GPT-4.1 Nano vs Claude Haiku 3.5 GPT-4.1 Nano vs Gemma 3 12B GPT-4.1 Nano vs Gemma 3 4B GPT-4.1 Nano vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.