Gemma 3 4B vs Cohere Rerank 3.5

Compare Gemma 3 4B and Cohere Rerank 3.5: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Google models All Cohere models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Gemma 3 4B Cohere Rerank 3.5
CategoryCompactReranking
Parameters4B~600M
Context Window128K4K
Input Price$0.008/1M tokens$0.002/search/1M tokens
Output Price$0.015/1M tokensN/A/1M tokens
Latency~60ms~25ms

Choose Gemma 3 4B when:

  • ✓ Intent detection
  • ✓ Keyword extraction
  • ✓ Preprocessing
Key Strengths:

Ultra-small, Fastest inference, Minimal cost

Choose Cohere Rerank 3.5 when:

  • ✓ Search reranking
  • ✓ RAG improvement
  • ✓ Result quality
Key Strengths:

Higher quality, Multilingual, Fast

Verdict: Gemma 3 4B vs Cohere Rerank 3.5

For cost efficiency, Cohere Rerank 3.5 wins at $0.002/search/1M input tokens. For speed, Cohere Rerank 3.5 is faster at ~25ms. Gemma 3 4B excels at Intent detection while Cohere Rerank 3.5 is better for Search reranking. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Gemma 3 4B costs $0.008/1M input tokens and $0.015/1M output tokens. Cohere Rerank 3.5 costs $0.002/search input and N/A output. Cohere Rerank 3.5 is 4.0x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Gemma 3 4B has a 128K context window with ~60ms latency. Cohere Rerank 3.5 offers 4K context at ~25ms. Gemma 3 4B has the larger context window.

Best For

Gemma 3 4B (Compact) is optimized for: Intent detection, Keyword extraction, Preprocessing. Cohere Rerank 3.5 (Reranking) works best for: Search reranking, RAG improvement, Result quality.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Gemma 3 4B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="gemma-3-4b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Cohere Rerank 3.5
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="rerank-v3-5",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Gemma 3 4B or Cohere Rerank 3.5?

Gemma 3 4B (Compact, 4B) offers Ultra-small. Cohere Rerank 3.5 (Reranking, ~600M) offers Higher quality. Choose Gemma 3 4B for Intent detection or Cohere Rerank 3.5 for Search reranking.

How much does Gemma 3 4B cost vs Cohere Rerank 3.5?

Gemma 3 4B: $0.008/1M input, $0.015/1M output. Cohere Rerank 3.5: $0.002/search/1M input, N/A/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Gemma 3 4B and Cohere Rerank 3.5 by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Gemma 3 4B vs GPT-4.1 Nano Gemma 3 4B vs GPT-4o Mini Gemma 3 4B vs Claude Haiku 3.5 Gemma 3 4B vs Gemma 3 12B Gemma 3 4B vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Gemma 3 4B vs Llama 3.1 8B Turbo

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.