Gemma 3 27B vs Llama 3.2 3B

Compare Gemma 3 27B and Llama 3.2 3B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Google models All Meta models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Gemma 3 27B Llama 3.2 3B
CategoryOpen SourceCompact
Parameters27B3B
Context Window128K128K
Input Price$0.03/1M tokens$0.006/1M tokens
Output Price$0.05/1M tokens$0.012/1M tokens
Latency~180ms~40ms

Choose Gemma 3 27B when:

  • ✓ Fast chatbots
  • ✓ Content moderation
  • ✓ Temple kiosks
Key Strengths:

Fast inference, Reliable output, Strong English/Hindi

Choose Llama 3.2 3B when:

  • ✓ Mobile apps
  • ✓ Edge inference
  • ✓ Preprocessing
Key Strengths:

Ultra-small, Edge-ready, Minimal latency

Verdict: Gemma 3 27B vs Llama 3.2 3B

For cost efficiency, Llama 3.2 3B wins at $0.006/1M input tokens. For speed, Gemma 3 27B is faster at ~180ms. Gemma 3 27B excels at Fast chatbots while Llama 3.2 3B is better for Mobile apps. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Gemma 3 27B costs $0.03/1M input tokens and $0.05/1M output tokens. Llama 3.2 3B costs $0.006 input and $0.012 output. Llama 3.2 3B is 5.0x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Gemma 3 27B has a 128K context window with ~180ms latency. Llama 3.2 3B offers 128K context at ~40ms. Both have identical context windows.

Best For

Gemma 3 27B (Open Source) is optimized for: Fast chatbots, Content moderation, Temple kiosks. Llama 3.2 3B (Compact) works best for: Mobile apps, Edge inference, Preprocessing.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Gemma 3 27B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="gemma-3-27b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Llama 3.2 3B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="llama-3-2-3b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Gemma 3 27B or Llama 3.2 3B?

Gemma 3 27B (Open Source, 27B) offers Fast inference. Llama 3.2 3B (Compact, 3B) offers Ultra-small. Choose Gemma 3 27B for Fast chatbots or Llama 3.2 3B for Mobile apps.

How much does Gemma 3 27B cost vs Llama 3.2 3B?

Gemma 3 27B: $0.03/1M input, $0.05/1M output. Llama 3.2 3B: $0.006/1M input, $0.012/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Gemma 3 27B and Llama 3.2 3B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Gemma 3 27B vs GPT-4.1 Nano Gemma 3 27B vs GPT-4o Mini Gemma 3 27B vs Claude Haiku 3.5 Gemma 3 27B vs Gemma 3 12B Gemma 3 27B vs Gemma 3 4B Gemma 3 27B vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.