FLUX.1 Dev vs InternVL 2.5 78B

Compare FLUX.1 Dev and InternVL 2.5 78B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Black Forest Labs models All Shanghai AI Lab models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature FLUX.1 Dev InternVL 2.5 78B
CategoryImageVision
Parameters12B78B
Context WindowN/A128K
Input Price$0.003/image/1M tokens$0.05/1M tokens
Output PriceN/A/1M tokens$0.10/1M tokens
Latency~3s~400ms

Choose FLUX.1 Dev when:

  • ✓ Custom styles
  • ✓ Fine-tuned imagery
  • ✓ Development
Key Strengths:

Fine-tunable, Good quality, Open weights

Choose InternVL 2.5 78B when:

  • ✓ Document analysis
  • ✓ Chart reading
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Strong visual reasoning, Open weights, Good OCR

Verdict: FLUX.1 Dev vs InternVL 2.5 78B

For cost efficiency, FLUX.1 Dev wins at $0.003/image/1M input tokens. For speed, FLUX.1 Dev is faster at ~3s. FLUX.1 Dev excels at Custom styles while InternVL 2.5 78B is better for Document analysis. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

FLUX.1 Dev costs $0.003/image/1M input tokens and N/A/1M output tokens. InternVL 2.5 78B costs $0.05 input and $0.10 output. FLUX.1 Dev is 16.7x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

FLUX.1 Dev has a N/A context window with ~3s latency. InternVL 2.5 78B offers 128K context at ~400ms. InternVL 2.5 78B has the larger context window.

Best For

FLUX.1 Dev (Image) is optimized for: Custom styles, Fine-tuned imagery, Development. InternVL 2.5 78B (Vision) works best for: Document analysis, Chart reading, Visual Q&A.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use FLUX.1 Dev
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="flux-1-dev",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use InternVL 2.5 78B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="internvl-2-5-78b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, FLUX.1 Dev or InternVL 2.5 78B?

FLUX.1 Dev (Image, 12B) offers Fine-tunable. InternVL 2.5 78B (Vision, 78B) offers Strong visual reasoning. Choose FLUX.1 Dev for Custom styles or InternVL 2.5 78B for Document analysis.

How much does FLUX.1 Dev cost vs InternVL 2.5 78B?

FLUX.1 Dev: $0.003/image/1M input, N/A/1M output. InternVL 2.5 78B: $0.05/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between FLUX.1 Dev and InternVL 2.5 78B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

FLUX.1 Dev vs Vedika Vision FLUX.1 Dev vs DALL-E 3 FLUX.1 Dev vs Imagen 3 FLUX.1 Dev vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision FLUX.1 Dev vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision FLUX.1 Dev vs Qwen 2.5 VL 72B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.