Cohere Embed v4 vs Aya Expanse 32B

Compare Cohere Embed v4 and Aya Expanse 32B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Cohere models All Cohere models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Cohere Embed v4 Aya Expanse 32B
CategoryEmbeddingOpen Source
Parameters~400M32B
Context Window128K128K
Input Price$0.001/1M tokens$0.03/1M tokens
Output PriceN/A/1M tokens$0.06/1M tokens
Latency~15ms~250ms

Choose Cohere Embed v4 when:

  • ✓ Long document RAG
  • ✓ Multimodal search
  • ✓ Large knowledge bases
Key Strengths:

128K context, Multimodal embedding, Matryoshka

Choose Aya Expanse 32B when:

  • ✓ Multilingual apps
  • ✓ Translation
  • ✓ Global content
Key Strengths:

23 languages, Open weights, Strong multilingual

Verdict: Cohere Embed v4 vs Aya Expanse 32B

For cost efficiency, Cohere Embed v4 wins at $0.001/1M input tokens. For speed, Cohere Embed v4 is faster at ~15ms. Cohere Embed v4 excels at Long document RAG while Aya Expanse 32B is better for Multilingual apps. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Cohere Embed v4 costs $0.001/1M input tokens and N/A/1M output tokens. Aya Expanse 32B costs $0.03 input and $0.06 output. Cohere Embed v4 is 30.0x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Cohere Embed v4 has a 128K context window with ~15ms latency. Aya Expanse 32B offers 128K context at ~250ms. Both have identical context windows.

Best For

Cohere Embed v4 (Embedding) is optimized for: Long document RAG, Multimodal search, Large knowledge bases. Aya Expanse 32B (Open Source) works best for: Multilingual apps, Translation, Global content.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Cohere Embed v4
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="embed-v4",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Aya Expanse 32B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="c4ai-aya-expanse-32b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Cohere Embed v4 or Aya Expanse 32B?

Cohere Embed v4 (Embedding, ~400M) offers 128K context. Aya Expanse 32B (Open Source, 32B) offers 23 languages. Choose Cohere Embed v4 for Long document RAG or Aya Expanse 32B for Multilingual apps.

How much does Cohere Embed v4 cost vs Aya Expanse 32B?

Cohere Embed v4: $0.001/1M input, N/A/1M output. Aya Expanse 32B: $0.03/1M input, $0.06/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Cohere Embed v4 and Aya Expanse 32B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Cohere Embed v4 vs Text Embedding 3 Large Cohere Embed v4 vs Gemma 3 27B Cohere Embed v4 vs Llama 4 Scout Cohere Embed v4 vs Llama 4 Maverick Cohere Embed v4 vs Llama 3.3 70B Cohere Embed v4 vs Llama 3.1 405B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.