DeepSeek V3.1 vs Dolphin 2.9.3 72B
Compare DeepSeek V3.1 and Dolphin 2.9.3 72B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.
Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology
| Feature | DeepSeek V3.1 | Dolphin 2.9.3 72B |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Open Source | Open Source |
| Parameters | 685B (37B active) | 72B |
| Context Window | 128K | 128K |
| Input Price | $0.06/1M tokens | $0.04/1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.10/1M tokens | $0.08/1M tokens |
| Latency | ~400ms | ~350ms |
Choose DeepSeek V3.1 when:
- ✓ Production apps
- ✓ Content generation
- ✓ Multi-language
Improved quality, Better safety, Stronger multilingual
Choose Dolphin 2.9.3 72B when:
- ✓ Creative writing
- ✓ Unrestricted generation
- ✓ Research
Uncensored, Strong instruction following, Versatile
Verdict: DeepSeek V3.1 vs Dolphin 2.9.3 72B
For cost efficiency, Dolphin 2.9.3 72B wins at $0.04/1M input tokens. For speed, Dolphin 2.9.3 72B is faster at ~350ms. DeepSeek V3.1 excels at Production apps while Dolphin 2.9.3 72B is better for Creative writing. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.
Detailed Analysis
Pricing Comparison
DeepSeek V3.1 costs $0.06/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. Dolphin 2.9.3 72B costs $0.04 input and $0.08 output. Dolphin 2.9.3 72B is 1.5x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.
Performance & Context
DeepSeek V3.1 has a 128K context window with ~400ms latency. Dolphin 2.9.3 72B offers 128K context at ~350ms. Both have identical context windows.
Best For
DeepSeek V3.1 (Open Source) is optimized for: Production apps, Content generation, Multi-language. Dolphin 2.9.3 72B (Open Source) works best for: Creative writing, Unrestricted generation, Research.
Try Both on XALEN
Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:
from xalen import XALEN
client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")
# Use DeepSeek V3.1
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
model="deepseek-v3-1",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)
# Use Dolphin 2.9.3 72B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
model="dolphin-2-9-3-72b",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, DeepSeek V3.1 or Dolphin 2.9.3 72B?
DeepSeek V3.1 (Open Source, 685B (37B active)) offers Improved quality. Dolphin 2.9.3 72B (Open Source, 72B) offers Uncensored. Choose DeepSeek V3.1 for Production apps or Dolphin 2.9.3 72B for Creative writing.
How much does DeepSeek V3.1 cost vs Dolphin 2.9.3 72B?
DeepSeek V3.1: $0.06/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Dolphin 2.9.3 72B: $0.04/1M input, $0.08/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.
Can I use both models on XALEN?
Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between DeepSeek V3.1 and Dolphin 2.9.3 72B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.
Related Comparisons
Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.