DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Nemotron 4 340B

Compare DeepSeek R1 0528 and Nemotron 4 340B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All DeepSeek models All NVIDIA models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature DeepSeek R1 0528 Nemotron 4 340B
CategoryReasoningOpen Source
Parameters671B340B
Context Window128K128K
Input Price$0.08/1M tokens$0.07/1M tokens
Output Price$0.15/1M tokens$0.12/1M tokens
Latency~800ms~500ms

Choose DeepSeek R1 0528 when:

  • ✓ Calculation verification
  • ✓ Classical text analysis
  • ✓ Quality-critical
Key Strengths:

Improved accuracy, Reduced hallucination, Strong math

Choose Nemotron 4 340B when:

  • ✓ Data generation
  • ✓ Training data
  • ✓ Research
Key Strengths:

Synthetic data generation, Large scale, Good quality

Verdict: DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Nemotron 4 340B

For cost efficiency, Nemotron 4 340B wins at $0.07/1M input tokens. For speed, Nemotron 4 340B is faster at ~500ms. DeepSeek R1 0528 excels at Calculation verification while Nemotron 4 340B is better for Data generation. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.08/1M input tokens and $0.15/1M output tokens. Nemotron 4 340B costs $0.07 input and $0.12 output. Nemotron 4 340B is 1.1x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

DeepSeek R1 0528 has a 128K context window with ~800ms latency. Nemotron 4 340B offers 128K context at ~500ms. Both have identical context windows.

Best For

DeepSeek R1 0528 (Reasoning) is optimized for: Calculation verification, Classical text analysis, Quality-critical. Nemotron 4 340B (Open Source) works best for: Data generation, Training data, Research.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use DeepSeek R1 0528
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="deepseek-r1-0528",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Nemotron 4 340B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="nemotron-4-340b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Nemotron 4 340B?

DeepSeek R1 0528 (Reasoning, 671B) offers Improved accuracy. Nemotron 4 340B (Open Source, 340B) offers Synthetic data generation. Choose DeepSeek R1 0528 for Calculation verification or Nemotron 4 340B for Data generation.

How much does DeepSeek R1 0528 cost vs Nemotron 4 340B?

DeepSeek R1 0528: $0.08/1M input, $0.15/1M output. Nemotron 4 340B: $0.07/1M input, $0.12/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between DeepSeek R1 0528 and Nemotron 4 340B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

DeepSeek R1 0528 vs o3 DeepSeek R1 0528 vs o3 Mini DeepSeek R1 0528 vs o4-mini DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Gemma 3 27B DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Llama 4 Scout DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Llama 4 Maverick

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.