DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Command A

Compare DeepSeek R1 0528 and Command A: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All DeepSeek models All Cohere models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature DeepSeek R1 0528 Command A
CategoryReasoningEnterprise
Parameters671B111B (37B active)
Context Window128K256K
Input Price$0.08/1M tokens$0.025/1M tokens
Output Price$0.15/1M tokens$0.10/1M tokens
Latency~800ms~300ms

Choose DeepSeek R1 0528 when:

  • ✓ Calculation verification
  • ✓ Classical text analysis
  • ✓ Quality-critical
Key Strengths:

Improved accuracy, Reduced hallucination, Strong math

Choose Command A when:

  • ✓ Enterprise RAG
  • ✓ Document Q&A
  • ✓ Agentic workflows
Key Strengths:

Strong RAG, Agentic, 256K context

Verdict: DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Command A

For cost efficiency, Command A wins at $0.025/1M input tokens. For speed, Command A is faster at ~300ms. DeepSeek R1 0528 excels at Calculation verification while Command A is better for Enterprise RAG. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.08/1M input tokens and $0.15/1M output tokens. Command A costs $0.025 input and $0.10 output. Command A is 3.2x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

DeepSeek R1 0528 has a 128K context window with ~800ms latency. Command A offers 256K context at ~300ms. Command A has the larger context window.

Best For

DeepSeek R1 0528 (Reasoning) is optimized for: Calculation verification, Classical text analysis, Quality-critical. Command A (Enterprise) works best for: Enterprise RAG, Document Q&A, Agentic workflows.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use DeepSeek R1 0528
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="deepseek-r1-0528",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Command A
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="command-a",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Command A?

DeepSeek R1 0528 (Reasoning, 671B) offers Improved accuracy. Command A (Enterprise, 111B (37B active)) offers Strong RAG. Choose DeepSeek R1 0528 for Calculation verification or Command A for Enterprise RAG.

How much does DeepSeek R1 0528 cost vs Command A?

DeepSeek R1 0528: $0.08/1M input, $0.15/1M output. Command A: $0.025/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between DeepSeek R1 0528 and Command A by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

DeepSeek R1 0528 vs o3 DeepSeek R1 0528 vs o3 Mini DeepSeek R1 0528 vs o4-mini DeepSeek R1 0528 vs DeepSeek R1 DeepSeek R1 0528 vs DeepSeek R1 Distill 70B DeepSeek R1 0528 vs DeepSeek R1 Distill 8B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.