DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Baichuan 4

Compare DeepSeek R1 0528 and Baichuan 4: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All DeepSeek models All Baichuan AI models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature DeepSeek R1 0528 Baichuan 4
CategoryReasoningOpen Source
Parameters671B~130B
Context Window128K128K
Input Price$0.08/1M tokens$0.05/1M tokens
Output Price$0.15/1M tokens$0.09/1M tokens
Latency~800ms~350ms

Choose DeepSeek R1 0528 when:

  • ✓ Calculation verification
  • ✓ Classical text analysis
  • ✓ Quality-critical
Key Strengths:

Improved accuracy, Reduced hallucination, Strong math

Choose Baichuan 4 when:

  • ✓ Chinese content
  • ✓ Cultural analysis
  • ✓ Bilingual apps
Key Strengths:

Strong Chinese, Cultural knowledge, Good reasoning

Verdict: DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Baichuan 4

For cost efficiency, Baichuan 4 wins at $0.05/1M input tokens. For speed, Baichuan 4 is faster at ~350ms. DeepSeek R1 0528 excels at Calculation verification while Baichuan 4 is better for Chinese content. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.08/1M input tokens and $0.15/1M output tokens. Baichuan 4 costs $0.05 input and $0.09 output. Baichuan 4 is 1.6x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

DeepSeek R1 0528 has a 128K context window with ~800ms latency. Baichuan 4 offers 128K context at ~350ms. Both have identical context windows.

Best For

DeepSeek R1 0528 (Reasoning) is optimized for: Calculation verification, Classical text analysis, Quality-critical. Baichuan 4 (Open Source) works best for: Chinese content, Cultural analysis, Bilingual apps.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use DeepSeek R1 0528
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="deepseek-r1-0528",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Baichuan 4
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="baichuan-4",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Baichuan 4?

DeepSeek R1 0528 (Reasoning, 671B) offers Improved accuracy. Baichuan 4 (Open Source, ~130B) offers Strong Chinese. Choose DeepSeek R1 0528 for Calculation verification or Baichuan 4 for Chinese content.

How much does DeepSeek R1 0528 cost vs Baichuan 4?

DeepSeek R1 0528: $0.08/1M input, $0.15/1M output. Baichuan 4: $0.05/1M input, $0.09/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between DeepSeek R1 0528 and Baichuan 4 by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

DeepSeek R1 0528 vs o3 DeepSeek R1 0528 vs o3 Mini DeepSeek R1 0528 vs o4-mini DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Gemma 3 27B DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Llama 4 Scout DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Llama 4 Maverick

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.