Deepgram Nova 3 vs InternVL 2.5 78B

Compare Deepgram Nova 3 and InternVL 2.5 78B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Deepgram models All Shanghai AI Lab models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Deepgram Nova 3 InternVL 2.5 78B
CategorySpeechVision
Parameters~1B78B
Context WindowStreaming128K
Input Price$0.004/min/1M tokens$0.05/1M tokens
Output PriceN/A/1M tokens$0.10/1M tokens
Latency~100ms~400ms

Choose Deepgram Nova 3 when:

  • ✓ Real-time transcription
  • ✓ Call centers
  • ✓ Meeting notes
Key Strengths:

Ultra-low latency, Streaming native, Very cheap

Choose InternVL 2.5 78B when:

  • ✓ Document analysis
  • ✓ Chart reading
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Strong visual reasoning, Open weights, Good OCR

Verdict: Deepgram Nova 3 vs InternVL 2.5 78B

For cost efficiency, Deepgram Nova 3 wins at $0.004/min/1M input tokens. For speed, Deepgram Nova 3 is faster at ~100ms. Deepgram Nova 3 excels at Real-time transcription while InternVL 2.5 78B is better for Document analysis. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Deepgram Nova 3 costs $0.004/min/1M input tokens and N/A/1M output tokens. InternVL 2.5 78B costs $0.05 input and $0.10 output. Deepgram Nova 3 is 12.5x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Deepgram Nova 3 has a Streaming context window with ~100ms latency. InternVL 2.5 78B offers 128K context at ~400ms. Both have identical context windows.

Best For

Deepgram Nova 3 (Speech) is optimized for: Real-time transcription, Call centers, Meeting notes. InternVL 2.5 78B (Vision) works best for: Document analysis, Chart reading, Visual Q&A.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Deepgram Nova 3
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="deepgram-nova-3",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use InternVL 2.5 78B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="internvl-2-5-78b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Deepgram Nova 3 or InternVL 2.5 78B?

Deepgram Nova 3 (Speech, ~1B) offers Ultra-low latency. InternVL 2.5 78B (Vision, 78B) offers Strong visual reasoning. Choose Deepgram Nova 3 for Real-time transcription or InternVL 2.5 78B for Document analysis.

How much does Deepgram Nova 3 cost vs InternVL 2.5 78B?

Deepgram Nova 3: $0.004/min/1M input, N/A/1M output. InternVL 2.5 78B: $0.05/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Deepgram Nova 3 and InternVL 2.5 78B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Deepgram Nova 3 vs Vedika Vision Deepgram Nova 3 vs Whisper Large V3 Deepgram Nova 3 vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision Deepgram Nova 3 vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision Deepgram Nova 3 vs Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Deepgram Nova 3 vs Qwen 2.5 VL 7B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.