DBRX vs Aya Expanse 32B

Compare DBRX and Aya Expanse 32B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Databricks models All Cohere models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature DBRX Aya Expanse 32B
CategoryEnterpriseOpen Source
Parameters132B (36B active)32B
Context Window32K128K
Input Price$0.04/1M tokens$0.03/1M tokens
Output Price$0.08/1M tokens$0.06/1M tokens
Latency~300ms~250ms

Choose DBRX when:

  • ✓ Data pipelines
  • ✓ Analytics
  • ✓ Enterprise workflows
Key Strengths:

MoE efficient, Good for data, Enterprise-grade

Choose Aya Expanse 32B when:

  • ✓ Multilingual apps
  • ✓ Translation
  • ✓ Global content
Key Strengths:

23 languages, Open weights, Strong multilingual

Verdict: DBRX vs Aya Expanse 32B

For cost efficiency, Aya Expanse 32B wins at $0.03/1M input tokens. For speed, Aya Expanse 32B is faster at ~250ms. DBRX excels at Data pipelines while Aya Expanse 32B is better for Multilingual apps. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

DBRX costs $0.04/1M input tokens and $0.08/1M output tokens. Aya Expanse 32B costs $0.03 input and $0.06 output. Aya Expanse 32B is 1.3x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

DBRX has a 32K context window with ~300ms latency. Aya Expanse 32B offers 128K context at ~250ms. Aya Expanse 32B has the larger context window.

Best For

DBRX (Enterprise) is optimized for: Data pipelines, Analytics, Enterprise workflows. Aya Expanse 32B (Open Source) works best for: Multilingual apps, Translation, Global content.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use DBRX
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="dbrx",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Aya Expanse 32B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="c4ai-aya-expanse-32b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, DBRX or Aya Expanse 32B?

DBRX (Enterprise, 132B (36B active)) offers MoE efficient. Aya Expanse 32B (Open Source, 32B) offers 23 languages. Choose DBRX for Data pipelines or Aya Expanse 32B for Multilingual apps.

How much does DBRX cost vs Aya Expanse 32B?

DBRX: $0.04/1M input, $0.08/1M output. Aya Expanse 32B: $0.03/1M input, $0.06/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between DBRX and Aya Expanse 32B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

DBRX vs Gemma 3 27B DBRX vs Llama 4 Scout DBRX vs Llama 4 Maverick DBRX vs Llama 3.3 70B DBRX vs Llama 3.1 405B DBRX vs Llama 3.1 70B Turbo

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.