DALL-E 3 vs Qwen 2.5 VL 72B

Compare DALL-E 3 and Qwen 2.5 VL 72B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All OpenAI models All Alibaba models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature DALL-E 3 Qwen 2.5 VL 72B
CategoryImageVision
Parameters~12B72B
Context WindowN/A128K
Input Price$0.04/image/1M tokens$0.05/1M tokens
Output PriceN/A/1M tokens$0.10/1M tokens
Latency~5s~400ms

Choose DALL-E 3 when:

  • ✓ Marketing imagery
  • ✓ Content illustrations
  • ✓ Social media graphics
Key Strengths:

Good text in images, Prompt adherence, Safe outputs

Choose Qwen 2.5 VL 72B when:

  • ✓ Document analysis
  • ✓ Chart reading
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Vision + language, Strong Asian text OCR, Good reasoning

Verdict: DALL-E 3 vs Qwen 2.5 VL 72B

For cost efficiency, DALL-E 3 wins at $0.04/image/1M input tokens. For speed, Qwen 2.5 VL 72B is faster at ~400ms. DALL-E 3 excels at Marketing imagery while Qwen 2.5 VL 72B is better for Document analysis. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

DALL-E 3 costs $0.04/image/1M input tokens and N/A/1M output tokens. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B costs $0.05 input and $0.10 output. DALL-E 3 is 1.3x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

DALL-E 3 has a N/A context window with ~5s latency. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B offers 128K context at ~400ms. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B has the larger context window.

Best For

DALL-E 3 (Image) is optimized for: Marketing imagery, Content illustrations, Social media graphics. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision) works best for: Document analysis, Chart reading, Visual Q&A.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use DALL-E 3
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="dall-e-3",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Qwen 2.5 VL 72B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="qwen-2-5-vl-72b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, DALL-E 3 or Qwen 2.5 VL 72B?

DALL-E 3 (Image, ~12B) offers Good text in images. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B (Vision, 72B) offers Vision + language. Choose DALL-E 3 for Marketing imagery or Qwen 2.5 VL 72B for Document analysis.

How much does DALL-E 3 cost vs Qwen 2.5 VL 72B?

DALL-E 3: $0.04/image/1M input, N/A/1M output. Qwen 2.5 VL 72B: $0.05/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between DALL-E 3 and Qwen 2.5 VL 72B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

DALL-E 3 vs Vedika Vision DALL-E 3 vs Imagen 3 DALL-E 3 vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision DALL-E 3 vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision DALL-E 3 vs Qwen 2.5 VL 7B DALL-E 3 vs Pixtral Large

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.