Command A vs Text Embedding 3 Small

Compare Command A and Text Embedding 3 Small: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Cohere models All OpenAI models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Command A Text Embedding 3 Small
CategoryEnterpriseEmbedding
Parameters111B (37B active)~200M
Context Window256K8K
Input Price$0.025/1M tokens$0.0002/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokensN/A/1M tokens
Latency~300ms~10ms

Choose Command A when:

  • ✓ Enterprise RAG
  • ✓ Document Q&A
  • ✓ Agentic workflows
Key Strengths:

Strong RAG, Agentic, 256K context

Choose Text Embedding 3 Small when:

  • ✓ Budget RAG
  • ✓ High-volume embedding
  • ✓ Simple search
Key Strengths:

Cheapest embedding, Very fast, Good quality for price

Verdict: Command A vs Text Embedding 3 Small

For cost efficiency, Text Embedding 3 Small wins at $0.0002/1M input tokens. For speed, Text Embedding 3 Small is faster at ~10ms. Command A excels at Enterprise RAG while Text Embedding 3 Small is better for Budget RAG. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Command A costs $0.025/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. Text Embedding 3 Small costs $0.0002 input and N/A output. Text Embedding 3 Small is 125.0x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Command A has a 256K context window with ~300ms latency. Text Embedding 3 Small offers 8K context at ~10ms. Command A has the larger context window.

Best For

Command A (Enterprise) is optimized for: Enterprise RAG, Document Q&A, Agentic workflows. Text Embedding 3 Small (Embedding) works best for: Budget RAG, High-volume embedding, Simple search.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Command A
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="command-a",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Text Embedding 3 Small
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="text-embedding-3-small",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Command A or Text Embedding 3 Small?

Command A (Enterprise, 111B (37B active)) offers Strong RAG. Text Embedding 3 Small (Embedding, ~200M) offers Cheapest embedding. Choose Command A for Enterprise RAG or Text Embedding 3 Small for Budget RAG.

How much does Command A cost vs Text Embedding 3 Small?

Command A: $0.025/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Text Embedding 3 Small: $0.0002/1M input, N/A/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Command A and Text Embedding 3 Small by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Command A vs Text Embedding 3 Large Command A vs Mistral Embed Command A vs E5 Large v2 Command A vs BGE Large v1.5 Command A vs Nomic Embed Text v1.5 Command A vs Voyage Large 2

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.