Command A vs SD 3.5 Medium

Compare Command A and SD 3.5 Medium: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Cohere models All Stability AI models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Command A SD 3.5 Medium
CategoryEnterpriseImage
Parameters111B (37B active)2.5B
Context Window256KN/A
Input Price$0.025/1M tokens$0.003/image/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokensN/A/1M tokens
Latency~300ms~2s

Choose Command A when:

  • ✓ Enterprise RAG
  • ✓ Document Q&A
  • ✓ Agentic workflows
Key Strengths:

Strong RAG, Agentic, 256K context

Choose SD 3.5 Medium when:

  • ✓ General imagery
  • ✓ Batch generation
  • ✓ Prototyping
Key Strengths:

Good quality, Fast, Open weights

Verdict: Command A vs SD 3.5 Medium

For cost efficiency, SD 3.5 Medium wins at $0.003/image/1M input tokens. For speed, SD 3.5 Medium is faster at ~2s. Command A excels at Enterprise RAG while SD 3.5 Medium is better for General imagery. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Command A costs $0.025/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. SD 3.5 Medium costs $0.003/image input and N/A output. SD 3.5 Medium is 8.3x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Command A has a 256K context window with ~300ms latency. SD 3.5 Medium offers N/A context at ~2s. Command A has the larger context window.

Best For

Command A (Enterprise) is optimized for: Enterprise RAG, Document Q&A, Agentic workflows. SD 3.5 Medium (Image) works best for: General imagery, Batch generation, Prototyping.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Command A
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="command-a",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use SD 3.5 Medium
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="stable-diffusion-3-5-medium",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Command A or SD 3.5 Medium?

Command A (Enterprise, 111B (37B active)) offers Strong RAG. SD 3.5 Medium (Image, 2.5B) offers Good quality. Choose Command A for Enterprise RAG or SD 3.5 Medium for General imagery.

How much does Command A cost vs SD 3.5 Medium?

Command A: $0.025/1M input, $0.10/1M output. SD 3.5 Medium: $0.003/image/1M input, N/A/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Command A and SD 3.5 Medium by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Command A vs DALL-E 3 Command A vs Imagen 3 Command A vs FLUX 1.1 Pro Command A vs FLUX.1 Schnell Command A vs FLUX.1 Dev Command A vs Ideogram V3

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.