Command A vs Deepgram Nova 3

Compare Command A and Deepgram Nova 3: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Cohere models All Deepgram models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Command A Deepgram Nova 3
CategoryEnterpriseSpeech
Parameters111B (37B active)~1B
Context Window256KStreaming
Input Price$0.025/1M tokens$0.004/min/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokensN/A/1M tokens
Latency~300ms~100ms

Choose Command A when:

  • ✓ Enterprise RAG
  • ✓ Document Q&A
  • ✓ Agentic workflows
Key Strengths:

Strong RAG, Agentic, 256K context

Choose Deepgram Nova 3 when:

  • ✓ Real-time transcription
  • ✓ Call centers
  • ✓ Meeting notes
Key Strengths:

Ultra-low latency, Streaming native, Very cheap

Verdict: Command A vs Deepgram Nova 3

For cost efficiency, Deepgram Nova 3 wins at $0.004/min/1M input tokens. For speed, Deepgram Nova 3 is faster at ~100ms. Command A excels at Enterprise RAG while Deepgram Nova 3 is better for Real-time transcription. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Command A costs $0.025/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. Deepgram Nova 3 costs $0.004/min input and N/A output. Deepgram Nova 3 is 6.3x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Command A has a 256K context window with ~300ms latency. Deepgram Nova 3 offers Streaming context at ~100ms. Both have identical context windows.

Best For

Command A (Enterprise) is optimized for: Enterprise RAG, Document Q&A, Agentic workflows. Deepgram Nova 3 (Speech) works best for: Real-time transcription, Call centers, Meeting notes.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Command A
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="command-a",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Deepgram Nova 3
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="deepgram-nova-3",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Command A or Deepgram Nova 3?

Command A (Enterprise, 111B (37B active)) offers Strong RAG. Deepgram Nova 3 (Speech, ~1B) offers Ultra-low latency. Choose Command A for Enterprise RAG or Deepgram Nova 3 for Real-time transcription.

How much does Command A cost vs Deepgram Nova 3?

Command A: $0.025/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Deepgram Nova 3: $0.004/min/1M input, N/A/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Command A and Deepgram Nova 3 by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Command A vs Whisper Large V3 Command A vs Command R+ Command A vs Jamba 1.5 Large Command A vs Arctic Large Command A vs DBRX Command A vs XTTS v2

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.