Codestral vs Llama Guard 3 8B

Compare Codestral and Llama Guard 3 8B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Mistral models All Meta models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Codestral Llama Guard 3 8B
CategoryCodeSafety
Parameters22B8B
Context Window256K128K
Input Price$0.03/1M tokens$0.01/1M tokens
Output Price$0.05/1M tokens$0.02/1M tokens
Latency~200ms~60ms

Choose Codestral when:

  • ✓ API integration code
  • ✓ SDK generation
  • ✓ Code review
Key Strengths:

256K context for code, Strong code generation, Good APIs

Choose Llama Guard 3 8B when:

  • ✓ Content moderation
  • ✓ Safety filtering
  • ✓ Input validation
Key Strengths:

Safety classification, Fast, Open weights

Verdict: Codestral vs Llama Guard 3 8B

For cost efficiency, Llama Guard 3 8B wins at $0.01/1M input tokens. For speed, Codestral is faster at ~200ms. Codestral excels at API integration code while Llama Guard 3 8B is better for Content moderation. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Codestral costs $0.03/1M input tokens and $0.05/1M output tokens. Llama Guard 3 8B costs $0.01 input and $0.02 output. Llama Guard 3 8B is 3.0x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Codestral has a 256K context window with ~200ms latency. Llama Guard 3 8B offers 128K context at ~60ms. Codestral has the larger context window.

Best For

Codestral (Code) is optimized for: API integration code, SDK generation, Code review. Llama Guard 3 8B (Safety) works best for: Content moderation, Safety filtering, Input validation.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Codestral
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="codestral",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Llama Guard 3 8B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="llama-guard-3-8b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Codestral or Llama Guard 3 8B?

Codestral (Code, 22B) offers 256K context for code. Llama Guard 3 8B (Safety, 8B) offers Safety classification. Choose Codestral for API integration code or Llama Guard 3 8B for Content moderation.

How much does Codestral cost vs Llama Guard 3 8B?

Codestral: $0.03/1M input, $0.05/1M output. Llama Guard 3 8B: $0.01/1M input, $0.02/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Codestral and Llama Guard 3 8B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Codestral vs Vedika Code Codestral vs DeepSeek Coder V2 Codestral vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Codestral vs StarCoder2 15B Codestral vs CodeGemma 7B Codestral vs StarCoder2 7B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.