Codestral vs Aya Expanse 32B

Compare Codestral and Aya Expanse 32B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Mistral models All Cohere models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Codestral Aya Expanse 32B
CategoryCodeOpen Source
Parameters22B32B
Context Window256K128K
Input Price$0.03/1M tokens$0.03/1M tokens
Output Price$0.05/1M tokens$0.06/1M tokens
Latency~200ms~250ms

Choose Codestral when:

  • ✓ API integration code
  • ✓ SDK generation
  • ✓ Code review
Key Strengths:

256K context for code, Strong code generation, Good APIs

Choose Aya Expanse 32B when:

  • ✓ Multilingual apps
  • ✓ Translation
  • ✓ Global content
Key Strengths:

23 languages, Open weights, Strong multilingual

Verdict: Codestral vs Aya Expanse 32B

For cost efficiency, Aya Expanse 32B wins at $0.03/1M input tokens. For speed, Codestral is faster at ~200ms. Codestral excels at API integration code while Aya Expanse 32B is better for Multilingual apps. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Codestral costs $0.03/1M input tokens and $0.05/1M output tokens. Aya Expanse 32B costs $0.03 input and $0.06 output. Both models are similarly priced. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Codestral has a 256K context window with ~200ms latency. Aya Expanse 32B offers 128K context at ~250ms. Codestral has the larger context window.

Best For

Codestral (Code) is optimized for: API integration code, SDK generation, Code review. Aya Expanse 32B (Open Source) works best for: Multilingual apps, Translation, Global content.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Codestral
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="codestral",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Aya Expanse 32B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="c4ai-aya-expanse-32b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Codestral or Aya Expanse 32B?

Codestral (Code, 22B) offers 256K context for code. Aya Expanse 32B (Open Source, 32B) offers 23 languages. Choose Codestral for API integration code or Aya Expanse 32B for Multilingual apps.

How much does Codestral cost vs Aya Expanse 32B?

Codestral: $0.03/1M input, $0.05/1M output. Aya Expanse 32B: $0.03/1M input, $0.06/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Codestral and Aya Expanse 32B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Codestral vs Vedika Code Codestral vs Gemma 3 27B Codestral vs Llama 4 Scout Codestral vs Llama 4 Maverick Codestral vs Llama 3.3 70B Codestral vs Llama 3.1 405B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.