Claude Opus 4.5 vs Gemma 3 4B

Compare Claude Opus 4.5 and Gemma 3 4B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Anthropic models All Google models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Claude Opus 4.5 Gemma 3 4B
CategoryFrontierCompact
Parameters~2.5T4B
Context Window200K128K
Input Price$0.15/1M tokens$0.008/1M tokens
Output Price$0.75/1M tokens$0.015/1M tokens
Latency~900ms~60ms

Choose Claude Opus 4.5 when:

  • ✓ Creative writing
  • ✓ Complex analysis
  • ✓ Research
Key Strengths:

Superior creativity, Nuanced reasoning, Complex analysis

Choose Gemma 3 4B when:

  • ✓ Intent detection
  • ✓ Keyword extraction
  • ✓ Preprocessing
Key Strengths:

Ultra-small, Fastest inference, Minimal cost

Verdict: Claude Opus 4.5 vs Gemma 3 4B

For cost efficiency, Gemma 3 4B wins at $0.008/1M input tokens. For speed, Gemma 3 4B is faster at ~60ms. Claude Opus 4.5 excels at Creative writing while Gemma 3 4B is better for Intent detection. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Claude Opus 4.5 costs $0.15/1M input tokens and $0.75/1M output tokens. Gemma 3 4B costs $0.008 input and $0.015 output. Gemma 3 4B is 18.8x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Claude Opus 4.5 has a 200K context window with ~900ms latency. Gemma 3 4B offers 128K context at ~60ms. Claude Opus 4.5 has the larger context window.

Best For

Claude Opus 4.5 (Frontier) is optimized for: Creative writing, Complex analysis, Research. Gemma 3 4B (Compact) works best for: Intent detection, Keyword extraction, Preprocessing.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Claude Opus 4.5
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="claude-opus-4-5",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Gemma 3 4B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="gemma-3-4b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.5 or Gemma 3 4B?

Claude Opus 4.5 (Frontier, ~2.5T) offers Superior creativity. Gemma 3 4B (Compact, 4B) offers Ultra-small. Choose Claude Opus 4.5 for Creative writing or Gemma 3 4B for Intent detection.

How much does Claude Opus 4.5 cost vs Gemma 3 4B?

Claude Opus 4.5: $0.15/1M input, $0.75/1M output. Gemma 3 4B: $0.008/1M input, $0.015/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Claude Opus 4.5 and Gemma 3 4B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-4.1 Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-4.1 Mini Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-4.1 Nano Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-4o Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-4o Mini Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.