Claude Haiku 3.5 vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision
Compare Claude Haiku 3.5 and Llama 3.2 90B Vision: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.
Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology
| Feature | Claude Haiku 3.5 | Llama 3.2 90B Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Compact | Vision |
| Parameters | ~20B | 90B |
| Context Window | 200K | 128K |
| Input Price | $0.008/1M tokens | $0.06/1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.04/1M tokens | $0.10/1M tokens |
| Latency | ~150ms | ~500ms |
Choose Claude Haiku 3.5 when:
- ✓ High-volume APIs
- ✓ Fast chatbots
- ✓ Content moderation
Very fast, Low cost, 200K context
Choose Llama 3.2 90B Vision when:
- ✓ Chart image analysis
- ✓ Document scanning
- ✓ Visual Q&A
Vision + language, Open weights, Good reasoning
Verdict: Claude Haiku 3.5 vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision
For cost efficiency, Claude Haiku 3.5 wins at $0.008/1M input tokens. For speed, Claude Haiku 3.5 is faster at ~150ms. Claude Haiku 3.5 excels at High-volume APIs while Llama 3.2 90B Vision is better for Chart image analysis. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.
Detailed Analysis
Pricing Comparison
Claude Haiku 3.5 costs $0.008/1M input tokens and $0.04/1M output tokens. Llama 3.2 90B Vision costs $0.06 input and $0.10 output. Claude Haiku 3.5 is 7.5x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.
Performance & Context
Claude Haiku 3.5 has a 200K context window with ~150ms latency. Llama 3.2 90B Vision offers 128K context at ~500ms. Claude Haiku 3.5 has the larger context window.
Best For
Claude Haiku 3.5 (Compact) is optimized for: High-volume APIs, Fast chatbots, Content moderation. Llama 3.2 90B Vision (Vision) works best for: Chart image analysis, Document scanning, Visual Q&A.
Try Both on XALEN
Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:
from xalen import XALEN
client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")
# Use Claude Haiku 3.5
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
model="claude-haiku-3-5",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)
# Use Llama 3.2 90B Vision
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
model="llama-3-2-90b-vision",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Claude Haiku 3.5 or Llama 3.2 90B Vision?
Claude Haiku 3.5 (Compact, ~20B) offers Very fast. Llama 3.2 90B Vision (Vision, 90B) offers Vision + language. Choose Claude Haiku 3.5 for High-volume APIs or Llama 3.2 90B Vision for Chart image analysis.
How much does Claude Haiku 3.5 cost vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision?
Claude Haiku 3.5: $0.008/1M input, $0.04/1M output. Llama 3.2 90B Vision: $0.06/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.
Can I use both models on XALEN?
Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Claude Haiku 3.5 and Llama 3.2 90B Vision by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.
Related Comparisons
Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.