Claude Haiku 3.5 vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision

Compare Claude Haiku 3.5 and Llama 3.2 11B Vision: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Anthropic models All Meta models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Claude Haiku 3.5 Llama 3.2 11B Vision
CategoryCompactVision
Parameters~20B11B
Context Window200K128K
Input Price$0.008/1M tokens$0.02/1M tokens
Output Price$0.04/1M tokens$0.04/1M tokens
Latency~150ms~200ms

Choose Claude Haiku 3.5 when:

  • ✓ High-volume APIs
  • ✓ Fast chatbots
  • ✓ Content moderation
Key Strengths:

Very fast, Low cost, 200K context

Choose Llama 3.2 11B Vision when:

  • ✓ Image classification
  • ✓ OCR
  • ✓ Simple visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Low cost vision, Fast, Compact

Verdict: Claude Haiku 3.5 vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision

For cost efficiency, Claude Haiku 3.5 wins at $0.008/1M input tokens. For speed, Claude Haiku 3.5 is faster at ~150ms. Claude Haiku 3.5 excels at High-volume APIs while Llama 3.2 11B Vision is better for Image classification. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Claude Haiku 3.5 costs $0.008/1M input tokens and $0.04/1M output tokens. Llama 3.2 11B Vision costs $0.02 input and $0.04 output. Claude Haiku 3.5 is 2.5x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Claude Haiku 3.5 has a 200K context window with ~150ms latency. Llama 3.2 11B Vision offers 128K context at ~200ms. Claude Haiku 3.5 has the larger context window.

Best For

Claude Haiku 3.5 (Compact) is optimized for: High-volume APIs, Fast chatbots, Content moderation. Llama 3.2 11B Vision (Vision) works best for: Image classification, OCR, Simple visual Q&A.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Claude Haiku 3.5
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="claude-haiku-3-5",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Llama 3.2 11B Vision
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="llama-3-2-11b-vision",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Claude Haiku 3.5 or Llama 3.2 11B Vision?

Claude Haiku 3.5 (Compact, ~20B) offers Very fast. Llama 3.2 11B Vision (Vision, 11B) offers Low cost vision. Choose Claude Haiku 3.5 for High-volume APIs or Llama 3.2 11B Vision for Image classification.

How much does Claude Haiku 3.5 cost vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision?

Claude Haiku 3.5: $0.008/1M input, $0.04/1M output. Llama 3.2 11B Vision: $0.02/1M input, $0.04/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Claude Haiku 3.5 and Llama 3.2 11B Vision by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Claude Haiku 3.5 vs Vedika Vision Claude Haiku 3.5 vs GPT-4.1 Nano Claude Haiku 3.5 vs GPT-4o Mini Claude Haiku 3.5 vs Gemma 3 12B Claude Haiku 3.5 vs Gemma 3 4B Claude Haiku 3.5 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.