Aya Expanse 32B vs StarCoder2 7B

Compare Aya Expanse 32B and StarCoder2 7B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Cohere models All BigCode models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Aya Expanse 32B StarCoder2 7B
CategoryOpen SourceCode
Parameters32B7B
Context Window128K16K
Input Price$0.03/1M tokens$0.008/1M tokens
Output Price$0.06/1M tokens$0.015/1M tokens
Latency~250ms~60ms

Choose Aya Expanse 32B when:

  • ✓ Multilingual apps
  • ✓ Translation
  • ✓ Global content
Key Strengths:

23 languages, Open weights, Strong multilingual

Choose StarCoder2 7B when:

  • ✓ Code completion
  • ✓ Quick generation
  • ✓ Editor integration
Key Strengths:

Open weights, Many languages, Fast

Verdict: Aya Expanse 32B vs StarCoder2 7B

For cost efficiency, StarCoder2 7B wins at $0.008/1M input tokens. For speed, Aya Expanse 32B is faster at ~250ms. Aya Expanse 32B excels at Multilingual apps while StarCoder2 7B is better for Code completion. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Aya Expanse 32B costs $0.03/1M input tokens and $0.06/1M output tokens. StarCoder2 7B costs $0.008 input and $0.015 output. StarCoder2 7B is 3.8x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Aya Expanse 32B has a 128K context window with ~250ms latency. StarCoder2 7B offers 16K context at ~60ms. Aya Expanse 32B has the larger context window.

Best For

Aya Expanse 32B (Open Source) is optimized for: Multilingual apps, Translation, Global content. StarCoder2 7B (Code) works best for: Code completion, Quick generation, Editor integration.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Aya Expanse 32B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="c4ai-aya-expanse-32b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use StarCoder2 7B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="starcoder2-7b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Aya Expanse 32B or StarCoder2 7B?

Aya Expanse 32B (Open Source, 32B) offers 23 languages. StarCoder2 7B (Code, 7B) offers Open weights. Choose Aya Expanse 32B for Multilingual apps or StarCoder2 7B for Code completion.

How much does Aya Expanse 32B cost vs StarCoder2 7B?

Aya Expanse 32B: $0.03/1M input, $0.06/1M output. StarCoder2 7B: $0.008/1M input, $0.015/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Aya Expanse 32B and StarCoder2 7B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Aya Expanse 32B vs Vedika Code Aya Expanse 32B vs Gemma 3 27B Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 4 Scout Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 4 Maverick Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.3 70B Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.1 405B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.