Aya Expanse 32B vs InternVL 2.5 78B

Compare Aya Expanse 32B and InternVL 2.5 78B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Cohere models All Shanghai AI Lab models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Aya Expanse 32B InternVL 2.5 78B
CategoryOpen SourceVision
Parameters32B78B
Context Window128K128K
Input Price$0.03/1M tokens$0.05/1M tokens
Output Price$0.06/1M tokens$0.10/1M tokens
Latency~250ms~400ms

Choose Aya Expanse 32B when:

  • ✓ Multilingual apps
  • ✓ Translation
  • ✓ Global content
Key Strengths:

23 languages, Open weights, Strong multilingual

Choose InternVL 2.5 78B when:

  • ✓ Document analysis
  • ✓ Chart reading
  • ✓ Visual Q&A
Key Strengths:

Strong visual reasoning, Open weights, Good OCR

Verdict: Aya Expanse 32B vs InternVL 2.5 78B

For cost efficiency, Aya Expanse 32B wins at $0.03/1M input tokens. For speed, Aya Expanse 32B is faster at ~250ms. Aya Expanse 32B excels at Multilingual apps while InternVL 2.5 78B is better for Document analysis. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Aya Expanse 32B costs $0.03/1M input tokens and $0.06/1M output tokens. InternVL 2.5 78B costs $0.05 input and $0.10 output. Aya Expanse 32B is 1.7x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Aya Expanse 32B has a 128K context window with ~250ms latency. InternVL 2.5 78B offers 128K context at ~400ms. Both have identical context windows.

Best For

Aya Expanse 32B (Open Source) is optimized for: Multilingual apps, Translation, Global content. InternVL 2.5 78B (Vision) works best for: Document analysis, Chart reading, Visual Q&A.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Aya Expanse 32B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="c4ai-aya-expanse-32b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use InternVL 2.5 78B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="internvl-2-5-78b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Aya Expanse 32B or InternVL 2.5 78B?

Aya Expanse 32B (Open Source, 32B) offers 23 languages. InternVL 2.5 78B (Vision, 78B) offers Strong visual reasoning. Choose Aya Expanse 32B for Multilingual apps or InternVL 2.5 78B for Document analysis.

How much does Aya Expanse 32B cost vs InternVL 2.5 78B?

Aya Expanse 32B: $0.03/1M input, $0.06/1M output. InternVL 2.5 78B: $0.05/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Aya Expanse 32B and InternVL 2.5 78B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Aya Expanse 32B vs Vedika Vision Aya Expanse 32B vs Gemma 3 27B Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 4 Scout Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 4 Maverick Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.3 70B Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.1 405B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.