Aya Expanse 32B vs Code Llama 70B

Compare Aya Expanse 32B and Code Llama 70B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Cohere models All Meta models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Aya Expanse 32B Code Llama 70B
CategoryOpen SourceCode
Parameters32B70B
Context Window128K100K
Input Price$0.03/1M tokens$0.04/1M tokens
Output Price$0.06/1M tokens$0.06/1M tokens
Latency~250ms~300ms

Choose Aya Expanse 32B when:

  • ✓ Multilingual apps
  • ✓ Translation
  • ✓ Global content
Key Strengths:

23 languages, Open weights, Strong multilingual

Choose Code Llama 70B when:

  • ✓ Large codebases
  • ✓ Code review
  • ✓ Refactoring
Key Strengths:

100K context, Strong coding, Fill-in-middle

Verdict: Aya Expanse 32B vs Code Llama 70B

For cost efficiency, Aya Expanse 32B wins at $0.03/1M input tokens. For speed, Aya Expanse 32B is faster at ~250ms. Aya Expanse 32B excels at Multilingual apps while Code Llama 70B is better for Large codebases. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Aya Expanse 32B costs $0.03/1M input tokens and $0.06/1M output tokens. Code Llama 70B costs $0.04 input and $0.06 output. Aya Expanse 32B is 1.3x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Aya Expanse 32B has a 128K context window with ~250ms latency. Code Llama 70B offers 100K context at ~300ms. Aya Expanse 32B has the larger context window.

Best For

Aya Expanse 32B (Open Source) is optimized for: Multilingual apps, Translation, Global content. Code Llama 70B (Code) works best for: Large codebases, Code review, Refactoring.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Aya Expanse 32B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="c4ai-aya-expanse-32b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Code Llama 70B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="codellama-70b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Aya Expanse 32B or Code Llama 70B?

Aya Expanse 32B (Open Source, 32B) offers 23 languages. Code Llama 70B (Code, 70B) offers 100K context. Choose Aya Expanse 32B for Multilingual apps or Code Llama 70B for Large codebases.

How much does Aya Expanse 32B cost vs Code Llama 70B?

Aya Expanse 32B: $0.03/1M input, $0.06/1M output. Code Llama 70B: $0.04/1M input, $0.06/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Aya Expanse 32B and Code Llama 70B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Aya Expanse 32B vs Vedika Code Aya Expanse 32B vs Gemma 3 27B Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 4 Scout Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 4 Maverick Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.3 70B Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.1 405B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.