Aya Expanse 32B vs CodeGemma 7B

Compare Aya Expanse 32B and CodeGemma 7B: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Cohere models All Google models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Aya Expanse 32B CodeGemma 7B
CategoryOpen SourceCode
Parameters32B7B
Context Window128K8K
Input Price$0.03/1M tokens$0.008/1M tokens
Output Price$0.06/1M tokens$0.015/1M tokens
Latency~250ms~60ms

Choose Aya Expanse 32B when:

  • ✓ Multilingual apps
  • ✓ Translation
  • ✓ Global content
Key Strengths:

23 languages, Open weights, Strong multilingual

Choose CodeGemma 7B when:

  • ✓ Code completion
  • ✓ Simple generation
  • ✓ Editor plugins
Key Strengths:

Compact, Fast code completion, Open weights

Verdict: Aya Expanse 32B vs CodeGemma 7B

For cost efficiency, CodeGemma 7B wins at $0.008/1M input tokens. For speed, Aya Expanse 32B is faster at ~250ms. Aya Expanse 32B excels at Multilingual apps while CodeGemma 7B is better for Code completion. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Aya Expanse 32B costs $0.03/1M input tokens and $0.06/1M output tokens. CodeGemma 7B costs $0.008 input and $0.015 output. CodeGemma 7B is 3.8x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Aya Expanse 32B has a 128K context window with ~250ms latency. CodeGemma 7B offers 8K context at ~60ms. Aya Expanse 32B has the larger context window.

Best For

Aya Expanse 32B (Open Source) is optimized for: Multilingual apps, Translation, Global content. CodeGemma 7B (Code) works best for: Code completion, Simple generation, Editor plugins.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Aya Expanse 32B
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="c4ai-aya-expanse-32b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use CodeGemma 7B
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="codegemma-7b",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Aya Expanse 32B or CodeGemma 7B?

Aya Expanse 32B (Open Source, 32B) offers 23 languages. CodeGemma 7B (Code, 7B) offers Compact. Choose Aya Expanse 32B for Multilingual apps or CodeGemma 7B for Code completion.

How much does Aya Expanse 32B cost vs CodeGemma 7B?

Aya Expanse 32B: $0.03/1M input, $0.06/1M output. CodeGemma 7B: $0.008/1M input, $0.015/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Aya Expanse 32B and CodeGemma 7B by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Aya Expanse 32B vs Vedika Code Aya Expanse 32B vs Gemma 3 27B Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 4 Scout Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 4 Maverick Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.3 70B Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.1 405B

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.