Arctic Large vs Stable Image Ultra

Compare Arctic Large and Stable Image Ultra: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Snowflake models All Stability AI models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Arctic Large Stable Image Ultra
CategoryEnterpriseImage
Parameters480B (17B active)~12B
Context Window128KN/A
Input Price$0.06/1M tokens$0.008/image/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokensN/A/1M tokens
Latency~400ms~4s

Choose Arctic Large when:

  • ✓ Data analysis
  • ✓ SQL generation
  • ✓ Business intelligence
Key Strengths:

Strong SQL, Data analysis, Enterprise features

Choose Stable Image Ultra when:

  • ✓ Premium photography
  • ✓ Marketing
  • ✓ Product shoots
Key Strengths:

Highest quality, Photorealistic, Professional

Verdict: Arctic Large vs Stable Image Ultra

For cost efficiency, Stable Image Ultra wins at $0.008/image/1M input tokens. For speed, Arctic Large is faster at ~400ms. Arctic Large excels at Data analysis while Stable Image Ultra is better for Premium photography. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Arctic Large costs $0.06/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. Stable Image Ultra costs $0.008/image input and N/A output. Stable Image Ultra is 7.5x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Arctic Large has a 128K context window with ~400ms latency. Stable Image Ultra offers N/A context at ~4s. Arctic Large has the larger context window.

Best For

Arctic Large (Enterprise) is optimized for: Data analysis, SQL generation, Business intelligence. Stable Image Ultra (Image) works best for: Premium photography, Marketing, Product shoots.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Arctic Large
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="arctic-large",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Stable Image Ultra
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="stable-image-ultra",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Arctic Large or Stable Image Ultra?

Arctic Large (Enterprise, 480B (17B active)) offers Strong SQL. Stable Image Ultra (Image, ~12B) offers Highest quality. Choose Arctic Large for Data analysis or Stable Image Ultra for Premium photography.

How much does Arctic Large cost vs Stable Image Ultra?

Arctic Large: $0.06/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Stable Image Ultra: $0.008/image/1M input, N/A/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Arctic Large and Stable Image Ultra by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Arctic Large vs DALL-E 3 Arctic Large vs Imagen 3 Arctic Large vs FLUX 1.1 Pro Arctic Large vs FLUX.1 Schnell Arctic Large vs FLUX.1 Dev Arctic Large vs Ideogram V3

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.