Arctic Large vs Cohere Rerank 3.5
Compare Arctic Large and Cohere Rerank 3.5: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.
Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology
| Feature | Arctic Large | Cohere Rerank 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Enterprise | Reranking |
| Parameters | 480B (17B active) | ~600M |
| Context Window | 128K | 4K |
| Input Price | $0.06/1M tokens | $0.002/search/1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.10/1M tokens | N/A/1M tokens |
| Latency | ~400ms | ~25ms |
Choose Arctic Large when:
- ✓ Data analysis
- ✓ SQL generation
- ✓ Business intelligence
Strong SQL, Data analysis, Enterprise features
Choose Cohere Rerank 3.5 when:
- ✓ Search reranking
- ✓ RAG improvement
- ✓ Result quality
Higher quality, Multilingual, Fast
Verdict: Arctic Large vs Cohere Rerank 3.5
For cost efficiency, Cohere Rerank 3.5 wins at $0.002/search/1M input tokens. For speed, Cohere Rerank 3.5 is faster at ~25ms. Arctic Large excels at Data analysis while Cohere Rerank 3.5 is better for Search reranking. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.
Detailed Analysis
Pricing Comparison
Arctic Large costs $0.06/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. Cohere Rerank 3.5 costs $0.002/search input and N/A output. Cohere Rerank 3.5 is 30.0x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.
Performance & Context
Arctic Large has a 128K context window with ~400ms latency. Cohere Rerank 3.5 offers 4K context at ~25ms. Arctic Large has the larger context window.
Best For
Arctic Large (Enterprise) is optimized for: Data analysis, SQL generation, Business intelligence. Cohere Rerank 3.5 (Reranking) works best for: Search reranking, RAG improvement, Result quality.
Try Both on XALEN
Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:
from xalen import XALEN
client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")
# Use Arctic Large
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
model="arctic-large",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)
# Use Cohere Rerank 3.5
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
model="rerank-v3-5",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Arctic Large or Cohere Rerank 3.5?
Arctic Large (Enterprise, 480B (17B active)) offers Strong SQL. Cohere Rerank 3.5 (Reranking, ~600M) offers Higher quality. Choose Arctic Large for Data analysis or Cohere Rerank 3.5 for Search reranking.
How much does Arctic Large cost vs Cohere Rerank 3.5?
Arctic Large: $0.06/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Cohere Rerank 3.5: $0.002/search/1M input, N/A/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.
Can I use both models on XALEN?
Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Arctic Large and Cohere Rerank 3.5 by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.
Related Comparisons
Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.