Arctic Large vs Cohere Embed v4

Compare Arctic Large and Cohere Embed v4: pricing, performance, context window, latency, and best use cases. Side-by-side comparison on XALEN.

Updated 2026-05-21 · By Abhishek Raj · Our methodology

All Snowflake models All Cohere models What is an LLM API? Python Quickstart What is inference?
Feature Arctic Large Cohere Embed v4
CategoryEnterpriseEmbedding
Parameters480B (17B active)~400M
Context Window128K128K
Input Price$0.06/1M tokens$0.001/1M tokens
Output Price$0.10/1M tokensN/A/1M tokens
Latency~400ms~15ms

Choose Arctic Large when:

  • ✓ Data analysis
  • ✓ SQL generation
  • ✓ Business intelligence
Key Strengths:

Strong SQL, Data analysis, Enterprise features

Choose Cohere Embed v4 when:

  • ✓ Long document RAG
  • ✓ Multimodal search
  • ✓ Large knowledge bases
Key Strengths:

128K context, Multimodal embedding, Matryoshka

Verdict: Arctic Large vs Cohere Embed v4

For cost efficiency, Cohere Embed v4 wins at $0.001/1M input tokens. For speed, Cohere Embed v4 is faster at ~15ms. Arctic Large excels at Data analysis while Cohere Embed v4 is better for Long document RAG. Both are available on XALEN through a single API — try them in the Playground to see which fits your workload.

Detailed Analysis

Pricing Comparison

Arctic Large costs $0.06/1M input tokens and $0.10/1M output tokens. Cohere Embed v4 costs $0.001 input and N/A output. Cohere Embed v4 is 60.0x cheaper on input tokens. XALEN offers batch processing at 50% discount on both models.

Performance & Context

Arctic Large has a 128K context window with ~400ms latency. Cohere Embed v4 offers 128K context at ~15ms. Both have identical context windows.

Best For

Arctic Large (Enterprise) is optimized for: Data analysis, SQL generation, Business intelligence. Cohere Embed v4 (Embedding) works best for: Long document RAG, Multimodal search, Large knowledge bases.

Try Both on XALEN

Both models are available through XALEN's OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between them by changing the model parameter:

from xalen import XALEN

client = XALEN(api_key="xln_test_YOUR_KEY")

# Use Arctic Large
response_a = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="arctic-large",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

# Use Cohere Embed v4
response_b = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="embed-v4",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Your question here"}]
)

Start Building with XALEN

200+ AI models. One API. Pay-as-you-go.

Get API Key Try in Playground

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Arctic Large or Cohere Embed v4?

Arctic Large (Enterprise, 480B (17B active)) offers Strong SQL. Cohere Embed v4 (Embedding, ~400M) offers 128K context. Choose Arctic Large for Data analysis or Cohere Embed v4 for Long document RAG.

How much does Arctic Large cost vs Cohere Embed v4?

Arctic Large: $0.06/1M input, $0.10/1M output. Cohere Embed v4: $0.001/1M input, N/A/1M output. Both available on XALEN with batch processing at 50% discount.

Can I use both models on XALEN?

Yes. XALEN provides 200+ models through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Switch between Arctic Large and Cohere Embed v4 by changing the model parameter. No code changes needed.

Related Comparisons

Arctic Large vs Text Embedding 3 Large Arctic Large vs Mistral Embed Arctic Large vs E5 Large v2 Arctic Large vs BGE Large v1.5 Arctic Large vs Nomic Embed Text v1.5 Arctic Large vs Voyage Large 2

Last updated: 2026-05-21. Pricing and specifications may change. Check pricing page for latest rates.