How We Test AI Models

By Abhishek Raj, CEO & Co-Founder · Updated May 2026

XALEN compares 200+ AI models across 6 dimensions: pricing accuracy, latency measurement, context window verification, output quality assessment, language support testing, and domain-specific benchmarking. All specifications are sourced from official provider documentation and verified through our API infrastructure.

Our Testing Methodology

1. Pricing Verification

All model pricing on XALEN is sourced from official provider pricing pages and API documentation. We track pricing changes weekly and update our comparison pages within 24 hours of any provider price change. Prices are displayed per 1 million tokens in USD for consistent comparison across providers.

2. Latency Measurement

Latency figures represent Time-to-First-Token (TTFT) measured from XALEN's infrastructure in US-Central and Asia-South regions. We measure median latency across 100 requests with a standardized prompt of 50 tokens. Latency varies by load, time of day, and prompt complexity — our figures represent typical production conditions.

3. Context Window Verification

Context window sizes are taken from official model cards and documentation. We verify claims by testing with progressively longer inputs up to the stated limit. If a model's effective context differs from its stated context (a known issue with some models), we note this in our comparison.

4. Output Quality Assessment

For domain-specialist models (Vedika series), we evaluate output quality against our internal test suite of 500+ astrology queries with known-correct answers verified by domain experts. For general models, we reference published benchmarks (MMLU, HumanEval, GPQA) from the model provider and independent evaluations.

5. Language Support Testing

Indian language support is tested with a standardized evaluation set of 50 prompts per language across Hindi, Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, Malayalam, Bengali, Marathi, Gujarati, Odia, Punjabi, Assamese, Sinhala, Nepali, and Sanskrit. We measure fluency, accuracy, and script correctness for each model.

6. Domain-Specific Benchmarking

For faith-tech applications, we evaluate models on: astrological term accuracy, classical text citation correctness, temple domain knowledge, and spiritual content sensitivity. Our Vedika models are specifically trained and evaluated on these dimensions — general models are not penalized for lower domain performance but the difference is noted.

Update Frequency

Model comparison data is refreshed on the following schedule:

Limitations & Transparency

We acknowledge that our comparisons have limitations:

About the Author

AR
Abhishek Raj
CEO & Co-Founder, XALEN Technology Pvt Ltd

Abhishek leads XALEN's engineering and product strategy. With deep expertise in AI infrastructure and computational astrology, he oversees the development of XALEN's model marketplace, Vedika domain-specialist models, and the Studio platform.

LinkedIn GitHub X / Twitter

See our methodology in action: compare any two models.

Browse Comparisons

Last updated: May 2026. Questions about our methodology? Email [email protected].